Does managerial discretion affect debt maturity in Chilean firms? An agency cost and asymmetric information approach

Main Article Content

Jorge Andrés Muñoz Mendoza
Sandra María Sepúlveda Yelpo

Keywords

Debt maturity, agency costs, ownership structure, manager reputation, monitoring

Abstract

We address debt maturity determinants for Chilean firms using data whose information was drawn from the Longitudinal Survey of Companies (ELE). Results from pooled Tobit regressions indicate that for firms with high growth opportunities, managerial discretion will encourage longer debt terms, a decision that contributes to reducing liquidity risk. For firms with low growth opportunities, managerial discretion does not affect debt maturity, while external monitoring reduces it. These results provide new evidence for international literature. Other conclusions suggest that debt maturity is positively related to firm size, capital structure, and asset tangibility and negatively related to agency costs and membership in a holding company. These findings are consistent with international studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 1017 | PDF Downloads 226 HTML Downloads 107 XML Downloads 18 MOBILE Downloads 0 ePUB Downloads 52

References

Alcock, J., Finn, F., B and Keng, K. (2011). Debt covenants, agency costs and debt maturity. working paper, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia.

Ang, J.S., Cole, R.A. and Lin J.W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, Vol. 55(1), pp. 81-106.

Azofra, V.P., Saona, P.H., and Vallelado, E.G. (2004). Estructura de propiedad y oportunidades de crecimiento como determinantes del endeudamiento de las empresas chilenas. Revista Abante ,Vol. 7, pp. 105-145.

Barclay, M.J. and Smith, C.W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50(2), pp. 609-631.

Barclay, M.J. and Smith, C.W. (1996). On financial architecture: Leverage, maturity, and priority. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 8(4), pp. 4-17.

Benmelech, E. (2006). Managerial entrenchment and debt maturity: Theory and evidence. working paper, Harvard University.

Berger, P.G., Ofek, E. and Yermack, D.L. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance, Vol. 52(4), pp. 1411–1438.

Berger, A., Espinosa-Vega, M., Frame, S. and Miller, N. (2005). Debt maturity, risk, and asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, Vol. 60(6), pp. 2895-2923.

Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: The MacMil¬lan Company.

Billet, M.T., King, T.D. and Mauer D.C. (2007). Growth opportunities and the choice of leverage, debt maturity and covenants. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 62(2), pp. 696-730.

Castañeda, F. and Contreras, F. (2016). The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure: The case of Chile. El Trimestre Económico, forthcoming.

Cuñat, V. (1999). Determinantes del plazo de endeudamiento de las empresas españolas. Investigaciones Económicas, Vol. 23(3), pp.351-392.

Danbolt , J., Hirst, I. and Jones, E. (2011). The growth companies puzzle: can growth opportunities measures predict firm growth?. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 17(1), pp.1-25.

Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M. and Raman, K. (2005). Managerial stock ownership and the maturity structure of corporate debt., The Journal of Finance, Vol. 60(5), pp. 2300-2350.

DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L. and Wruck, K.H. (2002). Asset liquidity, debt covenants and managerial discretion in financial distress: The collapse of L.A. Gear. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 64(1), pp.3-34.

Diamond, D. (1991). Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106(3), pp. 709-737.

Flannery, M. (1986). Asymmetric information and risky debt maturity choice. Journal of Finance, Vol. 41(1), pp. 19-37.

Fleming, G., Heaney, R. and McCosker, R. (2005). Agency costs and ownership structure in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 13(1), pp. 29-52.

Graham, J. and Harvey, C. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60(2), pp. 187-243.

Guedes, J. and Opler, T. (1996). The determinants of the maturity of corporate debt issue. Journal of Finance, Vol. 51(5), pp.1809-1833.

Harford, J., Li, K. and Zhao, X. (2008). Corporate boards and the leverage and debt maturity choices. International Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 1(1), pp. 3-27.

Hart, O.D. and Moore, J. (1995). Debt seniority: An analysis of the role of hard claims on constraining management. American Economic Review, Vol. 85(3), pp.567-585.

Harvey, C., Lins, K. and Roper, A. (2003). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. Working paper, Duke University, June.

Heyman, D., Deloof, M. and Ooghe, H. (2008). The financial structure of private held belgian firms. Small Business Economics, Vol. 30(3), pp.301-313.

Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, Vol. 76(2), pp. 323-329.

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3(4), pp. 305-360.

Jiraporn, P. and Tong, S. (2008). Debt maturity structure, agency costs and firm value. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.

Johnson, S. A. (1997). An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate debt ownership structure. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 32(1), pp. 47-69.

Johnson, S.A. (2003). Debt maturity and effects of growth opportunities and liquidity risk on leverage. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 16(1), pp. 209-236.

Joeveer, K. (2013). Firm, country and macroeconomic determinants of capital structure: Evidence from transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 294-308.

Kim, W. and Sorensen, E. (1986). Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt on corporate debt policy. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 21(2), pp. 131-144.

Kirch, G. and Soares, P. (2012). Determinants of corporate debt maturity in South America: Do institutional quality and financial development matter. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 18, pp. 980–993.

Kokoreva, M. and Ulugova, A. (2013). Economic and social development: Book of proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference, chapter “Agency costs and capital structure choice in emerging markets”, Paris, France, pp. 384-396.

Lasfer, M. (1999). Debt structure, agency costs and firm’s size: An empirical investigation. working paper, City University Business School, London

Leland, H. (1998). Agency costs, risk management and capital structure. Journal of Finance, Vol. 53(4), pp.1213-1243.

Leland, H. and Pyle, D. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, Vol. 32(2), pp. 371-387.

Mateus, C. and Terra, P. (2013). Leverage and the maturity structure of debt in emerging markets. Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 3, pp. 46-59.

Mohd, T., Bukit, R. and Mohd, Z. (2012). The moderating effect of ownership structure in the relationship between free cash flow and asset utilization. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 8(1), pp. 69-89.

Mokhova, N. and Zineckera, M. (2014). Macroeconomic factors and corporate capital structure. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 110, pp. 530-540.

Muñoz, J. and Sepúlveda, S. (2016). Monitoring mechanisms v/s managerial discretion: What prevails over agency costs in Chilean firms?. Working paper No. 3, University of Concepcion.

Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5(2), pp. 147-175.

Myers, S. and Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13(2), pp.187-221.

Ozkan, A. (2000). An empirical analysis of corporate debt maturity structure. European Financial Management, Vol. 6(2), pp. 197-212.

Ozkan, A. (2002). The determinants of corporate debt maturity: evidence from UK firms. Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12(1), pp. 19-24.

Rajan, R. and Winton, A. (1995). Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor. Journal of Finance, Vol. 50(4), pp.1113-1146.

Rakesh, H. M. and Lakshmi, P. (2013). Capital structure on agency costs: Evidence from Indian public companies. Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 15(1), pp. 50-53.

Ross, S.A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 8(1), pp. 23-40.

Saona, P. y Vallelado, E. (2005). Ownership structure and growth opportunities as determinants of bank debt: Evidence from Chilean companies. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Vol. 3(2), pp.121-136.

Saona, P. y Vallelado, E. (2014). "Is bank-debt maturity contingent on the financial system?. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, Vol. 27(2), pp.183-208

Scherr, F. and Hulburt, H. (2001). The debt maturity structure of small firms. Financial Management, Vol. 30(1), pp. 85-111.

Soares, P. (2009). Are leverage and debt maturity complements or substitutes? Evidence from Latin America. Revista de Administración, Vol. 10(6), pp. 4-24.

Soares, P. (2011). Determinants of corporate debt maturity in Latin America. European Business Review, Vol. 23(1), pp. 45-70.

Stohs, M. H and Mauer, D. C. (1996). The determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. Journal of Business, Vol. 69(3), pp. 279-312.

Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26(1), pp. 3–27.

Stulz, R. (2000). Does financial structure matter for economic growth? A corporate finance perspective. Ohio State University Working Paper.

Tanaka, T. (2015). Managerial discretion and the maturity structure of corporate public debt: Evidence from Japan. Working paper, Ritsumeikan University.