The impact of the output gap on the unemployment rate: evidence from Mexico, 1987q1-2018q4

Main Article Content

Manuel Garcìa-Ramos


Unemployment, Hysteresis, Output gap, Potential output, State-space model, Timevarying coefficients model, Okun’s law


Using quarterly data for Mexico from 1987Q1 to 2018Q4, we measure the impact of output gap on the unemployment rate based on a State-Space model with time-varying coefficients. From an econometric modeling point of view, this model allows asymmetrical interactions between the output gap and unemployment rate. Our principal conclusions are: 1) The long-term equilibrium unemployment rate is equal to 3.06; 2) the unemployment rate does not exhibit hysteresis; 3) when GDP is lower than potential output, the impact of its growth on the unemployment rate is -0.43 percent points; and 4) when GDP is higher than potential output, the impact of its growth on the unemployment rate is close to zero. It implies that the reaction of the unemployment rate to output gap is different when the output gap is increasing from that when the output gap is decreasing; i.e., the output gap does not have the same effect on the unemployment rate over time.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 134 | PDF (Español) Downloads 90


Arnold, RW. (2009). The Challenges of Estimating Potential Output in Real Time. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 91(4), pp. 271-90.
Chavarín, R. (2001). El costo del desempleo medido en producto: una revisión empírica de la ley de Okun para México. El Trimestre Económico, Vol. 68, No. 270(2), pp. 209-231.
Cheng, T., Gao, J. & Zhang, X. (2015). Bayesian Bandwidth Estimation in Nonparametric Time-Varying Coef-ficient Models. Working Paper 03/15, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Australia.
Cui, W., Härdle, W.K. & Wang, W. (2015). Estimation NAIRU with Inflation Expectation Data. SFB 649 Discus-sion Paper 2015-010.
De Jesús, L. & Carbajal, Y. (2011). Economic growth and unemployment in the State of Mexico: a structural relationship. Brazilian Journal of Urban Management, V. 3, N. 1, p. 77-88.
Durbin, J. & Koopman, SJ. (2001). Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford University Press, Ox-ford.
Fan, J. & Zhang, W. (2008). Statistical methods with varying coefficient models. Statistics and Its Interface, Vol. 1, 179-195.
Harris, R. & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s law: A cross−country comparison. Eco-nomics Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 2 pp. 1−13.
International Monetary Fund (2015). Where Are We Headed? Perspectives on Potential Output. World Eco-nomic Outlook, April 2015, Chapter 3.
Islas-Camargo, A. & Cortez, WW. (2013). An assessment of the dynamics between the permanent and transi-tory components of Mexico’s output and unemployment. CEPAL Review, 111.
Islas-Camargo, A. & Cortez, WW. (2011). Revisiting Okun’s law for Mexico: an analysis of the permanent and transitory components of unemployment and output. MPRA Paper, No 30026.
Kalman, RE. (1960). A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Transactions of the ASME–Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(Series D), 35–45.
Kalman, RE. & Bucy, RS. (1961). New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory. Journal of Basic Engi-neering, 95.
Lancaster, D. & Tulip, P. (2015). Okun’s Law and Potential Output. Research Discussion Paper, Reserve Bank of Australia, RDP2015-14.
Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun’s law: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22, 331–356.
Liquitaya, JD. & Lizarazu, E. (2004). La Ley de Okun en la Economía Mexicana. Revista Denarius, Núm. 8, De-partamento de Economía, UAM-I.
Loría, E., Ramírez, E. & Salas, E. (2015). La Ley de Okun y la flexibilidad laboral en México: un análisis de cointe-gración, 1997Q3-2014Q1. Contaduría y administración, 60(3), 631-650.
Loría, E., Libreros, C. & Salas, E. (2012). Okun’s Law in Mexico: A Gender Approach, 2000.2-2011.1. Investi-gación Económica, Vol. 71, No. 280.
Loría, E. & de Jesús, L. (2011). The Robustness of Okun’s Law: Evidence from Mexico. A Quarterly Validation, 1985.1–2006.4. In: G. Ángeles, I. Perrotini y H. Ríos (ed.). Market Liberalism, Growth, and Economic Development in Latin America. Routledge, Gran Bretaña, pp. 264- 276.
Loría, E. & García-Ramos, M. (2008). La ley de Okun: una relectura para México, 1970-2004. Estudios Económi-cos, Vol. 22, Núm. 1.
Lucas, RE. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 1, 19–46.
OECD (2019a). Quarterly GDP. doi: 10.1787/b86d1fc8-en.
OECD (2019b). Harmonised unemployment rate. doi: 10.1787/52570002-en.
Okun, AM. (1962). Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. Proceedings of the Business and Eco-nomic Statistics Section, pp. 98-104.
Palley, TI. (1993). Okun’s Law and the Asymmetric and Changing Cyclical Behaviour of the USA Economy’, International Review of Applied Economics, 7, 144-162.
Rodenburg, P. (2007). Derived Measurement in Macroeconomics: Two Approaches for Measuring the NAIRU Considered. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, University of Amsterdam.íguez, P. & de Jesús, F. (2007). Estimación de la Ley de Okun para la economía mexicana. Análisis Económi-co, XXII(51).
Ros, J. (2013). Algunas tesis equivocadas sobre el estancamiento económico en México. Grandes Problemas de México, el Colegio de México.Silvapulle, P., Moosa, IA., & Silvapulle, MJ. (2004). Asymmetry in Okun’s law. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 353–374., M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics Letters, 70, 253-257.
Weiner, S. (1993). New Estimates of the Natural Rate of Unemployment. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Vol. 78, No. 4.