70 year since the armistice in the Korean peninsula: Diections for peace and unification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17230/map.v13.i24.06Keywords:
Armistice, unification, inter-Korean relations, agency, structure, security, power, Northeast Asia, stabilityAbstract
In July 2023, the seventieth anniversary of the signing of the armistice that paused the Korean War was commemorated. This fratricidal conflagration began as an internal conflict, but became international when the disputing parties looked abroad for support for their causes, which gave rise to the intervention of foreign interests after the liberation in 1945. The common cause was the formation of a single Korea, although there was more than one vision about the configuration of the political economy of the new nation-state. This article agrees with the argument that the division of the Korean Peninsula is not only the result of external processes, but that the governments and dominant elites in both Koreas are co-responsible. Due to the agency of the protagonists and their interest in survival as the ultimate objective, it is argued that the idea of reunification has a counterproductive impact on the peace process on the Korean Peninsula and is an explanatory variable of the difficulties in changing the regional security structure.
Downloads
References
Cumings, B. (2010). The Korean War: A History. N. York: Modern Library.
Haggard, S., & Noland, M. (2007). Famine in North Korea: Markets, Aid, and Reform. N. York: Columbia University Press.
Haggard, S., & Noland, M. (2008). North Korea's foreign economic relations. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 8(2), 219-246. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26159484.
Kim, K. (Ed.) (2014). Global Expectations for Korean Unification. Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification.
Kwak, T.-h. (1985). The Stalemate in Inter-Korean Unification Dialogue: Issues and Perspectives. Korea Journal, 25(2), 4-17.
Lankov, A. (2015). The Real North Korea. Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia. N. York: Oxford University Press.
Lankov, A. (2017). Why Nothing Can Really Be Done about North Korea’s Nuclear Program. Asia Policy, (23), 104-110.
López Aymes, J.F. (2023). Transformación internacional y sobrevivencia del régimen en Corea del Norte: mercadización y programa nuclear. Revista Internacional de Estudios Asiáticos, 2(1), 166-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.15517/riea.v2i3.
López Aymes, J.F., Romero Castilla, A., Escalona Agüero, A., & León Manríquez, J.L. (2009). El Rompecabezas Coreano de la Posguerra: Legado Colonial, Liberación, División y Guerra (1945-1953). En J.L. León Manriquez (Ed.), Historia Mínima de Corea (pp. 117-146). MCiudad de México: El Colegio de México.
Oropeza García, A. (Ed.) (2021). Corea. Una visión jurídica y geopolítica en el siglo XXI. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.
Panda, A. (2020). Kim Jong Un and the Bomb: Survival and Deterrence in North Korea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roldán, E. (2015). Las grandes potencias en la península coreana ¿Qué pasa en Corea del Norte y Corea del Sur? Ciudad de México: Asociación Mexicana de Estudios Internacionales.
Romero Castilla, A. (1974). La reconciliación de las dos Coreas. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, (4), 34-48.
Smith, H. (2015). North Korea: Markets and Military Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weathersby, K. (1993). Soviet Aims in Korea and the Origins of the Korean War, 1945-1950: New Evidence from Russian Archives. Working Paper No. 8, Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Zwirko, C. (2023). Kim Jong Un stresses ‘exponential’ nuke production at parliamentary session. NK News, (23 de septiembre, 2023). Disponible en: https://www.nknews.org/2023/09/kim-jong-un-stresses-exponential-nuke-production-at-parliamentary-session/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
