Behaviors Differentiated by Role and Moral Responsibility of the Legal Profession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp13.89.1Keywords:
Role, lawyer, behavior, criminal system, traditional view, client, morality, neutral partisanship, lawyer client relationshipAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the way in which attorney-client relations can convert the former, that is, the lawyers, into "amoral" and even "immoral" persons in our dealings with the rest of humanity. In other words, we want to consider on whether there are adequate justifications for lawyers to inhabit what, according to Wasserstrom, at best is a "morally simplified", often "amoral" and sometimes "clearly immoral" world. Considering this, it is pertinent to address questions, such as: Should moral responsibility be attributed to those who assist their constituencies to achieve results clearly contrary to the public interest although it can be argued that such efforts do not exceed the framework of the law? Does the answer to this question vary, either according to the nature of the representation or advice in question, or the characteristics of the represented or advised party?
Downloads
References
ABBE SMITH, “Defending Defending: The Case for Unmitigated Zeal on Behalf of People who have done Terrible Things”, en Hofstra L. Rev , Vol. 28., 2000, pp. 925, 929.
CHARLES P. CURTIS, “The Ethics of Advocacy”, en Stan. L. Rev., Vol. 4, 1951, p. 3.
DEBORAH RHODE, “Ethical Perspectives on Legal Practice”, en Standford Law Review, Vol. 37, 1985, pp. 589, 605.
ELLMANN, STEPHEN, “Lawyers and Clients” en U.C.L.A L, Vol. 34, 1987, p. 717.
FREEDMAN, MONROE H, “Judge Frankel's search for truth” en U. Pa. L. Rev., , vol. 123, 1974, p. 1060.
FREEDMAN, MONROE H, “Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Defense Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions”, en Mich. L. Rev., Vol. 64, 1966, p. 1469
HARRY I. SUBIN, “The Criminal Lawyer’s ‘Different Mission’: Reflections on the ‘Right’ to Present a False Case”, en Geo. J. Legal Ethics, Vol. 1, 1987, p. 125.
HARRY I. SUBIN, “The Criminal Lawyer’s ‘Different Mission’: Reflections on the ‘Right’ to Present a False Case”, en Geo. J. Legal Ethics, Vol. 1, 1987, p. 125.
KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN, “Torture Necessity and the Union of Law and Philosophy”, en Rutgers L. J., Vol. 36, 2004, p. 184.
L. RHODE, DEBORAH & LUBAN, DAVID, Legal Ethics 38, Ed. 4th, Foundation Press, 2004.
LUBAN, DAVID, “Lysistratian Prerrogative: A Response to Stephen Pepper”, en Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 11, Nº 4, American Bar Foundation, 1986.
MARVIN E. FRANKEL, The Search for Truth: An Umpire´s View, Vol. 123 Nº 5, University of Pennsylvania, Law Review, 1975.
MONROE H. FREEDMAN, “Personal Responsibility in a Professional System”, en Cath. U. L. Rev., Vol. 27, 197, pp. 191–192.
MONROE H. FREEDMAN, “Personal Responsibility in a Professional System”, en Cath. U. L. Rev, Vol. 27., 1978, pp. 191-192,
MOUNTS, SUZANNE, “Premeditation and Deliberation in California: Returning to a Distinction Without a Difference”, en U.S.F. L. Rev., Vol. 36, pp. 261 – 296.
NILSEN, EVA, “The Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Reliance on Bias and Prejudice” en Geo. J. Legal Ethics, Vol. 8, 1994, pp. 1-3.
RHODE , DEBORAH, In the Interest of Justice 3, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
RHODE, “Access to Justice: An Agenda for Legal Education and Research”, en Fordham L. Rev. Vol. 69, 2001, pp.104-106.
RICHARD WASSERSTROM, “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues” en Human Rights, Vol. 5, 1975, pp. 1-24.
ROGER C. CRAMTON, “Furthering Justice by Improving the Adversary System and Making Lawyers More Accountable” en Fordham L. Rev., Vol. 70, 2002, p. 1599.
ROGER C. CRAMTON, On Giving Meaning to “Professionalism”, en ABA Teaching and Learning Professionalism: Symposium Proceedings, Ed. Oct 2-4, 1996, pp. 7-8.
SIMON, WILLIAM H, “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics” en Wis. L. Rev., 1978, pp. 29-30. Disponible en: https://www.scribd.com/document/349281667/THE-IDEOLOGY-OF-ADVOCACY-PROCEDURAL-JUSTICE-AND-PROFESSIONAL-ETHICS
SMITH, ABBE y MONTROSS, WILLIAM, “The Calling of Criminal Defense” en Mercer L. Rev., Vol. 50, 1999, pp. 443-446.
STEPHEN BRIGHT, “Keep the Dream Alive” en Yale L. Report, Vol. 2, Fall, 1999.
STEPHEN PEPPER, “The Lawyer’s Amoral Ethical Role: A Defense, a Problem, and some Possibilities” en Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 11, Nº 4, 1986, pp. 613 – 634.
STRAUSS, MARCY, “Toward a Revised Model of Attorney-Client Relationship: The Argument for Autonomy” en NCL Rev., vol. 65, 1987, p. 315
TED SCHNEYER, “Moral Philosophy’s Standard Misconception of Legal Ethics” en Wisc. L. Rev, 1984, p. 1529
WILLIAM H. SIMON, “Ethical Discretion in Lawyering 101” en Harv. Law Review, Vol.1083 Nº 1083, 1988.
WILLIAM H. SIMON, The Practice of Justice 1, cit., p. 170. Citando a LUBAN, DAVID, “Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study”, en Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 58-66.
WILLIAM SIMON, “The Ethics of Criminal Defense”, en Mich. L. Rev., Vol. 91, 1992, p. 1703.
ZITRIN, RICHARD & LANGFORD, CAROL, “The Moral Compass of the American Lawyer: truth, justice, power, and Greed” en Responsive Community, Vol. 9, 1999, pp. 65-68
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
