Liberty by expiration of the term to accuse: an interpretation from constitutional principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp16.94.5Keywords:
Expiration of terms, normative antinomy, systematic interpretation, grammatical analysis, duration of the procedures, constitutional principles, proportionality test.Abstract
The study carried out for the 317.4 article of the code of criminal procedure begins with a brief comment on the inadmissibility of applying a grammatical interpretation of the text, to then go on the shelves of the Congress in order to find the spirit of the law in regards to deadlines to accuse and having to do with the regime of freedom. With equal end you come to principles of constitutional interpretation and technique that implements the test of proportionality. This analysis contains the different modifications that has suffered the article 317 to date, and shows the gradual increase of the procedural terms of the articles under analysis; It also unraveled the mistake made by the legislator in the last three reforms to article 317, which fades the sense of the law the legal text making incoherent.
Downloads
References
BERNAL CUÉLLAR, JAIME, y EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNET. El proceso penal. Tomo I: Fundamentos constitucionales y teoría general. 6ta edición. Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013. http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/visorepub/39979
BERNAL PULIDO, CARLOS. El derecho de los derechos. Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2005.
BERNAL PULIDO, CARLOS. El principio de proporcionalidad y la interpretación constitucional. Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Serie Justicia y derechos humanos. Neoconsitucionalismo y sociedad. Quito, Ecuador: 2008. http://www.biblio.dpp.cl/biblio/DataBank/4271.pdf
BERNAL PULIDO, CARLOS. El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales: el principio de proporcionalidad como criterio para determinar el contenido de los derechos fundamentales vinculantes para el legislador. 4ta Edición. Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2014. http://www.digitaliapublishing.com/visorepub/39982
BERNAL PULIDO, CARLOS. La racionalidad de la ponderación, El principio de proporcionalidad y la interpretación constitucional. Quito, Ecuador: MIGUEL CARBONELL, 2008. http://www.biblio.dpp.cl/biblio/DataBank/4271.pdf
JANAMPA ALMORA, JUAN JOSÉ. Perspectivas sobre la interpretación jurídica y constitucional. Una Aproximación conceptual al problema. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/24951/TFM_MEADH_Juan_Janampa_2017.pdf
RIVERO LAMAS, JUAN. “El principio de Especialidad y la aplicación de las normas laborales”. Revista de Política Social, Noº 87 (1970). http://www.cepc.gob.es/publicaciones/revistas/fondo-historico?IDR=10&IDN=847&IDA=30397
TARDÍO PATO, JOSÉ ANTONIO. “El principio de Especialidad Normativa (Lex Specialis) y sus aplicaciones jurisprudenciales.” Revista de administración pública, Nº 162 (2003). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=784932
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
