The influence of the upper echelons in the return on the assets of companies that make up part of the non-cyclical consumer goods and services economic sector

Authors

  • Daiane Antonini Bortoluzzi Federal University of Santa Catarina
  • Maryely Andrea Jimenez Franco Federal University of Santa Catarina
  • Silvio Aparecido Silva Aparecido Silva Federal University of Paraná
  • Rogério João Lunkes Federal University of Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.31.4

Keywords:

Upper echelons theory, demographic characteristics, performance evaluation

Abstract

The upper echelons theory, which was initially introduced by Hambrick and Mason (1984), affirms that the cognitions, values, and perceptions of senior executives influence the strategy selection process, and consequently, the company’s performance. Accordingly, the overall objective of this study was to verify the existence of the influence of demographic characteristics of senior executives in the business economic performance of the companies listed in the non-cyclical sector of the BM&FBOVESPA (Sao Paulo Stock Exchange in Brazil) in 2014. The study sample consists of 39 companies of the non-cyclical sector and the data collected were then provided by 182 directors. Based on the results, it was noted that among variables such as education level, age, gender, and time in office, age was the only variable that did not show any statistically significant relationship with the organizational performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Daiane Antonini Bortoluzzi, Federal University of Santa Catarina

    Doctoranda en Administración, programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

  • Maryely Andrea Jimenez Franco, Federal University of Santa Catarina

    Maestranda en Contabilidad, programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

  • Silvio Aparecido Silva Aparecido Silva, Federal University of Paraná

    Doctorando en Ingeniería de Producción, programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção (PPGEP) da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Magíster en Métodos Numéricos em Engenharia pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR).

  • Rogério João Lunkes, Federal University of Santa Catarina

    Posdoctorado en Contabilidad, Universidad de Valencia (España). Profesor del programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade e Administração pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Buchholtz, A. K., & Ribbens, B. A. (1994). Role of chief executive officers in takeover resistance: Effects of CEO incentives and individual characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 554-579.

Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.

Camelo-Ordaz, C., Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. Journal of Management Development, 24(8), 683-705.

Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 275-284.

Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of management, 30(6), 749-778.

Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S. (2003). Métodos de Pesquisa em Administração. 7. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2003.

Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.

Dhaouadi, K. (2014). The influence of top management team traits on corporate financial performance in the US. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 31(3), 200-213.

Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: a theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 329-346.

Finkelstein, S., & D'aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management journal, 37(5), 1079-1108.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484-503.

Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.

Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of management review, 32(2), 334-343.

Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO's tenure. Academy of management review, 16(4), 719-742.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of management, 25(3), 417-456.

Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of management journal, 24(4), 689-713.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. D. A. (2010). Fundamentos da metodologia científica. Altas.

Neto, A. A., & Lima, F. G. (2009). Curso de administração financeira. Atlas.

Mishra, C. S., & Nielsen, J. F. (1999). The association between bank performance, board independence, and CEO pay-performance sensitivity. Managerial Finance, 25(10), 22-33.

PENI, Emilia. CEO and Chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, v. 18, n. 1, p. 185-205, 2014.

Rajagopalan, N., & Datta, D. K. (1996). CEO characteristics: does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 197-215.

Simeon, R. (2001). Top team characteristics and the business strategies of Japanese firms. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 1(2), 4-12.

Soares, E. (2003). Metodologia científica: lógica, epistemologia e normas. Atlas.

Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2015). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 1-37.

Thomas, A., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. 1991. The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 509-522.

Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008.

Wang, L., & Gao, P. (2010, August). An Empirical Research on the Relationship between Top Management Teams' Tenure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Real Estate Companies. In Management and Service Science (MASS), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91-121.

Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of management Review, 23(1), 133-153.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Antonini Bortoluzzi, D., Jimenez Franco, M. A., Aparecido Silva, S. A. S., & João Lunkes, R. (2017). The influence of the upper echelons in the return on the assets of companies that make up part of the non-cyclical consumer goods and services economic sector. AD-Minister, 31, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.31.4