Expressions in logical and argumental knowledge

Authors

Keywords:

Husserl, phenomenology, Perelman, argument, expressions

Abstract

In this paper I echo and discuss the husserlian thesis according to which , from t h e philosophical viewpoint, study of knowledge could be confused with the study either of necessary previous conditions or of its consequences (See, for example, Husserl 1998, pp. 95-103, 155-243). The paper shows the site or place that the study of linguistic expressions enjoys with respect to this difficulty in the logical investigations and goes to the discuss some phenomenological distinctions relative to linguistic expressions, observing that the initial understanding seems to restrict itself to just logical knowledge. With the purpose of making the last point clear, we end up considering language and argumentative knowledge in the light of the previously given phenomenological distinctions.

Author Biography

  • Julder Gómez, Universidad EAFIT

    Docente del Departamento de Humanidades de la Escuela de ciencias y humanidades de la Universidad Eafit.

References

Apel, Carl (1985) La Transformación de la Filosofía (I). Madrid, Taurus.

Heidegger, Martin (2004) Lógica. Madrid, Alianza.

Husserl, Edmund (1995) Investigaciones Lógicas (I y II). Barcelona, Altaza.

Perelman, Ch. y Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1989) Tratado de la Argumentación. Madrid,Gredos.

Tugendhat, E. y Wolf, U. (1997) Propedéutica Lógico-semántica. Barcelona, Anthropos.

Welton, Donn (1983) Theorigins of meaning. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff

Downloads

Published

2007-05-29

Issue

Section

Dossier

How to Cite

Gómez, J. (2007). Expressions in logical and argumental knowledge. Co-herencia, 4(6), 23-41. https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/355