The paradox of a Freedom of Thinking without a Freedom of Action in the State

Authors

  • Chantal Jaquet Centre d'Histoire des Philosophies modernes de la Sorbonne

Keywords:

Spinoza, freedom of expression, freedom of action, obedience

Abstract

The Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise is a powerful defense of the freedoms of thought and expression. But the philosopher says, moreover, that no one is completely entitled to act according to their wishes and at its discretion, because everybody must unconditionally obey the laws, even the most absurd. Is it a paradox? Is it possible to separate clearly the fields of the freedom of expression and the freedom of action in political life? Is it possible to establish with precision the limits of freedom of action? To address this matter, the article reminds us a text of Spinoza, who, using the example of Ulysses with sirens, points out that obeying is not necessarily to fulfill the orders. It is not a matter of civil disobedience or of a right to rebellion, but of the right to a perfect obedience: a freedom of action in accordance with a truly common Constitution.

Author Biography

  • Chantal Jaquet, Centre d'Histoire des Philosophies modernes de la Sorbonne
     

Downloads

Published

2018-03-20

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 28 (2018)

Section

Monographic I Spinoza. Araucaria, revista Iberoaméricana de Filosofía, Política

License

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Avisos:

  • No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
  • No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
 

How to Cite

Jaquet, C. (2018). The paradox of a Freedom of Thinking without a Freedom of Action in the State. Co-herencia, 15(28). https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/5040