El giro político-cultural en los estudios del poder urbano
Main Article Content
Keywords
Poder urbano, Política urbana, Giro cultural, Instituciones, Discurso
Resumen
Este artículo contribuye a que la literatura del análisis político urbano recupere sus fundamentos políticos y deje atrás su economicismo. Con este fin, establece un diálogo entre esta sub-disciplina de la Ciencia Política que estudia el “poder urbano”, y la Economía Política Cultural (EPC), una nueva corriente teórica que busca re-explorar las posibilidades de la economía política al tomar seriamente el giro cultural y lingüístico que se ha dado en las ciencias sociales en las últimas dos décadas. El aporte teórico entonces estará centrado examinar cómo cambia el estudio del poder urbano al incluir los nuevos elementos teóricos de la EPC, especialmente aquellos basados en su re-interpretación de los trabajos de Antonio Gramsci, Michel Foucault y Chantal Mouffe, de los cuales adopta conceptos claves como la hegemonía, el antagonismo, los discursos, las tecnologías de poder y el proceso de co-evolución entre discursos e instituciones, el cual constituye el principal aporte de la EPC.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Referencias
Archer, M., 1995, Realist social theory: the Morphogenetic Approach. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caputo, J. – Yount, M., 1993, “Institutions, normalization, and power”, en: J. Caputo – M. Yount (eds.) Foucault and the critique of institutions. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Castells, M., 1974, La cuestión urbana. Madrid: Siglo XXI editores.
Cox, K. R., 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics: a critical view”, en: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (11). pp. 433-440.
Cochrane, A., 1999, “Redefining urban politics for the twenty-first cen-tury”, en: Jonas, A. E. G. – Wilson, D. (eds.) Urban Growth Machines: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 109–124.
Dahl, R., 1961, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dean, M., 1994, Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and histo-rical sociology. London: Routledge.
Elkin, S. L., 1987, City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Fairclough, N. – Jessop, B. – Sayer, A., 2001, Critical Realism and Semiosis. Disponible en: http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/lnc/lncarchive.html (Consul-tado, junio de 2003).
Fairclough, N., 2000, New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., 2001, “Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”, en: R. Wodak – M. Meyer. (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N., 2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social re-search. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M., 1980, Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings (1972-1977). Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.
Foucault, M., 1994, Power-essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M., 2000, Defenderla Sociedad, Curso del Collège de France (1975-1976). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Foucault, M., 2004, Society Must Be Defended., trad. David Macey. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M., 2007, Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the college de France: 1977-1978. London: Palgrave.
Gramsci, A., 2003, Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Hunter, F., 1953, Community power structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Jones, M.; Jones, R.; Woods, M., 2004, An introduction to political geogra-phy: space, place and politics. London: Routledge.
Jessop, B., 1990, State theory: Putting Capitalist States in their place. Cam-bridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B., 1997, “Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Ur-ban Politics in a Global Economy”, en: Lauria, M., (ed.) Reconstructing Re-gime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. London: Sage.
Jessop, B., 2003, Cultural Political Economy, the Knowledge-Based Economy, and the State. Available from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/lnc/lncarchive.html [Revisado en Julio de 2003].
Jessop, B., 2004, “Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Eco-nomy”, en: Critical Discourse studies, vol. 1). no. 1). pp. 159-174.
Jessop, B., 2006, From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power, Political Geogra-phy, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.polgeo. [Consultado el 8 de febrero de 2006].
Jessop, B., 2007, State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. London: Polity.
Jessop, B. – Sum, N.L., 2000, “An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong’s Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter)Urban Competition”, en: Ur-ban Studies, 37 (November), pp. 2287-2313.
Jessop, B. – Sum, N. L., 2001, “The pre-and post-disciplinary perspecti-ves of political economy”, en: New Political Economy, Vol 6, No. 1, pp. 89–101.
Jones, S., 2006, Antonio Gramsci. Routledge: LondonLauria, M., 1997, (ed.) Reconstructing Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Po-litics in a Global Economy. London: Sage.
Lindblom, C., 1977, Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic.
Logan, J. R. – Molotch, H., 1987, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Macleod, G. – Goodwin, M., 1999, “Space, scale and state strategy: re-thinking urban and regional governance”, en: Progress in Human Geogra-phy, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 503-527.
Marsden, R., 1999, The nature of capital: Marx after Foucault. London: Routledge.
Molotch, H., 1976, “The City As a Growth Machine”, en: American Jour-nal of Sociology 82). pp. 309-330.
Mouffe, C., 2005, The return of the political. London: Verso.
Peterson, P., 1981, City Limits. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ribera-Fumaz, R., 2009, “From urban political economy to cultural politi-cal economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban”, en: Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 447-465.
Sayer, A., 2000, Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
Sayer, A., 2001, “For a Critical Cultural Political Economy”, en: Antipode, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 687-708.
Stone, C., 1987, The study of the politics of urban development, en Cla-rence Stone y Heywood Sanders (Eds.) The Politics of Urban development.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, pp. 3-22.
Stone, C., 1989, Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta (1946-1988). Lawren-ce: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, C., 2005, “Looking Back to Look Forward: Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis”, en: Urban Affairs Review, 40, pp. 309-341.
Stoker, G., Mossberger, K., 1994, “Urban regime theory in comparative perspective”, en: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 195-212.
Stoker, G. – Mossberger, K., 2001, “The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of Conceptualization”, en: Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 810-835.
Sum, N. L., 2003, From ‘Integral State’ to ‘Integral World Order’: Towards a Neo-Gramscian Cultural International Political Economy. Presentado en Con-ferencia de CPE, disponible en, www.internationalgramscisociety.org/com-munications/images_of_gramsci.html [consultado en 28 de julio (2006].
Sum, N. L., 2007, Demologos Thematic Synthesis. Paper 4: Culture, Dis-course, Ideology and Hegemony. Documento interno no publicado. De-partment of Politics and International Relations, Lancaster University.
Wodak, R., 2001, “What is CDA about?”, en: R. Wodak – M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Caputo, J. – Yount, M., 1993, “Institutions, normalization, and power”, en: J. Caputo – M. Yount (eds.) Foucault and the critique of institutions. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Castells, M., 1974, La cuestión urbana. Madrid: Siglo XXI editores.
Cox, K. R., 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics: a critical view”, en: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (11). pp. 433-440.
Cochrane, A., 1999, “Redefining urban politics for the twenty-first cen-tury”, en: Jonas, A. E. G. – Wilson, D. (eds.) Urban Growth Machines: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 109–124.
Dahl, R., 1961, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dean, M., 1994, Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and histo-rical sociology. London: Routledge.
Elkin, S. L., 1987, City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Fairclough, N. – Jessop, B. – Sayer, A., 2001, Critical Realism and Semiosis. Disponible en: http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/lnc/lncarchive.html (Consul-tado, junio de 2003).
Fairclough, N., 2000, New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., 2001, “Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”, en: R. Wodak – M. Meyer. (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N., 2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social re-search. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M., 1980, Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings (1972-1977). Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.
Foucault, M., 1994, Power-essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M., 2000, Defenderla Sociedad, Curso del Collège de France (1975-1976). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Foucault, M., 2004, Society Must Be Defended., trad. David Macey. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M., 2007, Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the college de France: 1977-1978. London: Palgrave.
Gramsci, A., 2003, Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Hunter, F., 1953, Community power structure: A study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Jones, M.; Jones, R.; Woods, M., 2004, An introduction to political geogra-phy: space, place and politics. London: Routledge.
Jessop, B., 1990, State theory: Putting Capitalist States in their place. Cam-bridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B., 1997, “Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Ur-ban Politics in a Global Economy”, en: Lauria, M., (ed.) Reconstructing Re-gime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. London: Sage.
Jessop, B., 2003, Cultural Political Economy, the Knowledge-Based Economy, and the State. Available from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/lnc/lncarchive.html [Revisado en Julio de 2003].
Jessop, B., 2004, “Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Eco-nomy”, en: Critical Discourse studies, vol. 1). no. 1). pp. 159-174.
Jessop, B., 2006, From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power, Political Geogra-phy, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.polgeo. [Consultado el 8 de febrero de 2006].
Jessop, B., 2007, State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. London: Polity.
Jessop, B. – Sum, N.L., 2000, “An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong’s Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter)Urban Competition”, en: Ur-ban Studies, 37 (November), pp. 2287-2313.
Jessop, B. – Sum, N. L., 2001, “The pre-and post-disciplinary perspecti-ves of political economy”, en: New Political Economy, Vol 6, No. 1, pp. 89–101.
Jones, S., 2006, Antonio Gramsci. Routledge: LondonLauria, M., 1997, (ed.) Reconstructing Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Po-litics in a Global Economy. London: Sage.
Lindblom, C., 1977, Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic.
Logan, J. R. – Molotch, H., 1987, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Macleod, G. – Goodwin, M., 1999, “Space, scale and state strategy: re-thinking urban and regional governance”, en: Progress in Human Geogra-phy, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 503-527.
Marsden, R., 1999, The nature of capital: Marx after Foucault. London: Routledge.
Molotch, H., 1976, “The City As a Growth Machine”, en: American Jour-nal of Sociology 82). pp. 309-330.
Mouffe, C., 2005, The return of the political. London: Verso.
Peterson, P., 1981, City Limits. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ribera-Fumaz, R., 2009, “From urban political economy to cultural politi-cal economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban”, en: Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 447-465.
Sayer, A., 2000, Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
Sayer, A., 2001, “For a Critical Cultural Political Economy”, en: Antipode, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 687-708.
Stone, C., 1987, The study of the politics of urban development, en Cla-rence Stone y Heywood Sanders (Eds.) The Politics of Urban development.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, pp. 3-22.
Stone, C., 1989, Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta (1946-1988). Lawren-ce: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, C., 2005, “Looking Back to Look Forward: Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis”, en: Urban Affairs Review, 40, pp. 309-341.
Stoker, G., Mossberger, K., 1994, “Urban regime theory in comparative perspective”, en: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 195-212.
Stoker, G. – Mossberger, K., 2001, “The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of Conceptualization”, en: Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 810-835.
Sum, N. L., 2003, From ‘Integral State’ to ‘Integral World Order’: Towards a Neo-Gramscian Cultural International Political Economy. Presentado en Con-ferencia de CPE, disponible en, www.internationalgramscisociety.org/com-munications/images_of_gramsci.html [consultado en 28 de julio (2006].
Sum, N. L., 2007, Demologos Thematic Synthesis. Paper 4: Culture, Dis-course, Ideology and Hegemony. Documento interno no publicado. De-partment of Politics and International Relations, Lancaster University.
Wodak, R., 2001, “What is CDA about?”, en: R. Wodak – M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Article Sidebar
Publicado
jul 16, 2012
Article Details
Cómo citar
Leyva Botero, S. (2012). El giro político-cultural en los estudios del poder urbano. Co-Herencia, 9(16), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.9.16.8
Número
Sección
Artículos
Agencias de apoyo
Biografía del autor/a
Santiago Leyva Botero, Universidad EAFIT
Doctor en Administración Pública, Universidad de Lancaster, Inglaterra. Profesor y jefe del pregrado en Ciencias Políticas, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín-Colombia. Miembro del Grupo de Investigación Estudios sobre Política y Lenguaje (cat. A1-Colciencias).Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
