La autodeliberación y la estrategia del pseudodiálogo
Main Article Content
Keywords
Esquemas de argumentación, Booth, Descartes, estrategia retórica, autodeliberación
Resumen
La Nueva Retórica identifica al autodeliberador como uno de los tres tipos principales de audiencia. Pero dicho giro hacia el yo no guarda concordancia con los estudios contemporáneos de la argumentación, particularmente en cuanto a lo social. La argumentación ocurre “allí afuera” y modifica los ambientes donde operan las audiencias. Resulta igualmente interesante el uso de la autodeliberación como estrategia retórica. En la argumentación con uno mismo, especialmente cuando dicho ser se encuentra de alguna manera alejado de la persona involucrada, se utiliza la autodeliberación más allá de los fines que Perelman le asignó. El objetivo del presente artículo es explorar las características del autodeliberador como audiencia y la autodeliberación como estrategia retórica empleada en la argumentación.
Descargas
Referencias
Augustine (1991). Confessions. Henry Chadwick (Trans). Oxford University Press.
Booth, W. (1974). Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. University of Notre Dame Press.
Booth, W. (1998). Confessions of an Aging, Hypocritical Ex-Missionary. Sunstone, 21(109), 25-36. https://www.sunstonemagazine.com/pdf/109-25-36.pdf
Caton, H. (1982). Descartes’ Anonymous Writings: A Recapitulation. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 20(3), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1982.tb00298.x
Davies, R. (2015). A Celtic Temperament: Robertson Davies as Diarist. McClelland & Stewart.
Descartes, R. (1989 [1649]). The Passions of the Soul (S. H. Voss, Trans.). In Hackett Publishing.
Gilbert, M. (2014). Arguing with People. Broadview Press.
Gill, C. (1991). Is There a Concept of Person in Greek Philosophy? In Stephen Everson (Ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought: 2: Psychology (pp. 166-193). Cambridge University Press.
Gill, C. (1996). Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford University Press.
Gill, C. (2006). The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford University Press.
Hample, D. (2018). Interpersonal Arguing. Peter Lang.
Johnson, R. (2013). The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 46(4), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0533
Kahn, C. (1988). Discovering the Will: From Homer to Augustine. In J. Dillon and A.A. Long (Eds.), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy (pp. 234-259). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. (1998). Pragmatism. In The Peirce Edition Project (Eds.), The Essential Peirce, volume 2 (1893-1913) (pp. 398-433). Indiana University Press.
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson, & P. Weaver, Trans.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman, C. (1982). The Realm of Rhetoric. University of Notre Dame Press.
Plato. (1997). Plato: Collected Works (J. M. Cooper, Ed.). Hackett.
Santibáñez Yáñez, C. (2012). Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies. Informal Logic, 32(1), 132-159. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i1.3536
Tindale, C. W. (2004). Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Sage.
Tindale, C. W. (2010) Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument. University of South Carolina Press.
Tindale, C. W. (2011). Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, Agents and Persons. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(3), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin
Walton, D. (2016). Intelligent Practical Reasoning for Autonomous Agents: An Introduction. Review of European Studies, 8(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v8n1p1
Walton, D., Reed, C. & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press.
Woodruff, P. (1982). Plato: Hippias Major. Hackett.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Christopher W. Tindale, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric University of Windsor
Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Waterloo. Director, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric, & Professor Department of Philosophy University of Windsor.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
