Socrates on Egoism. Does he say we should be virtuous and egoists?

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.10.19.2

Palavras-chave:

eudaimonia, virtues, egoism, Socrates, Klosko, Nakhnikian, Rudebusch, Irwin

Resumo

In this paper I address the issue whether Socratic eudaimonia entails egoism. It is, whether according to Socrates’ view a man who acts having his happiness as final criteria for his acts is an egoist. This view seems to be in contradiction with what we commonly think a moral theory must say. I gather previous attempts to answer this question in two big groups: formalists and substantivists, based on their general objectives. I argue that the second kind of approach is more effective because it tries to see and interpret Socratic theory as a whole and make it more coherent. It takes Socrates as providing a theory of human motivation to act in which the agent seeks his happiness, but in which friendship, love, and justice play a fundamental role.

Biografia do Autor

  • Diana Hoyos Valdés, University of Caldas

    Master in Philosophy, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia. PhD Philosophy Student at the University of Oklahoma-USA. Fulbrighter 2011. Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Caldas.

Referências

Bobonich, C. (2011). “Socrates and Eudaimonia”, in: D. R. Morrison (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Irwin, Terence (1977). Plato’s Moral Theory, The Early and Middle Dialo-gues. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Klosko, George (1980). «On the Analysis of “Protagoras”», en: Phoenix, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 307-322.

Nakhnikian, George (1973). “The First Socratic Paradox”, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy. Volume 11, Number 1, January.

Penner, Terry (2010). “Socratic Ethics and Socratic Psychology of Ac-tion”, in: The Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge University Press.

Plato (1997). Complete Works. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by John M. Cooper. Hackett Publishing Company.

Priece, A. W. (1989). Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Clarendon Paperbacks.

Rudebush, George (2003). “Socratic Perfectionism”, in: Desire, Identity and Existence; Essays in honor to T.M. Penner. Kelowna B.C., Canada.

Segvic, Heda (2006). “No One Errs Willingly: the Meaning of Socratic Intellectualism”, in: A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: Blackwell.

Vlastos, Gregory (1981). Platonic Studies. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Publicado

2013-11-28

Edição

Vol. 10 N.º 19 (2013)

Secção

Artigos

Licença

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Avisos:

  • No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
  • No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
 

Como Citar

Hoyos Valdés, D. (2013). Socrates on Egoism. Does he say we should be virtuous and egoists? Co-herencia, 10(19), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.10.19.2