Political science and its methods: a comparison among the programs of social sciences in colombia
Main Article Content
Keywords
Resolution 466 of 2007, social sciences, political science, qualitative methods, quantitative methods
Abstract
Resolution 466 of 2007, issued by the Ministry of National Education, represents an unprecedented avatar institutionalization of political science in Colombia. However, although advances in defining the specific quality characteristics and development of programs regard to methodology, fails to establish a clear distinction between social science programs. For this reason, this paper aims to investigate the specificity of the political science discipline from a review of research methods in the undergraduate programs of universities in Bogota. To this effect, the paper is divided into two parts: First, a review of the epistemological discussion on methods of discipline in France and England; and second, a review of the contents and bibliography of the methodology syllabus of social science programs at universities in Bogota. In the end it will show that there are no specific methods of political science but rather generic methods for the social sciences.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alvesson, M. – Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Angermüller, J. (2005). «"Qualitative" Methods of Social Research in France: Reconstructing the Actor, Deconstructing the Subject», en: Fo-rum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 19. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503194
Blanchet, A. – Ghiglione, R. – Massonnat, J. – Trognon, A., (1989). Téc-nicas de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Narcea, S.A. de ediciones.
Blanchet A. – Gotman A., (2005). L'entretien: L'enquête et ses méthodes. Paris: Armand Colin.
Barrientos del monte, F. (2013). “La Ciencia Política en América Latina. Una breve introducción histórica”, en: Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Vol 20 (Núm 61), 105–133.
Bejarano, A. M., – Wills, M. E. (2005). “La Ciencia Política en Colombia: de vocación a disciplina”, en: Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 111–123.
Blondiaux, L. (1998). La fabrique de l’opinion, une histoire sociale des sonda-ges. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (janvier 1973). “L’opinion publique n’existe pas”, en: Les Temps modernes, No. 318, pp. 1292-1309.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, H. E. – Collier, D. “Political Science Methodology”, en: Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Brady, H. E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. USA: Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Braud, Ph. (1982). La Science politique. Paris: PUF, Que sais-je?
Bréchon, P. (Dir.) (2011). Enquêtes qualitatives, enquêtes quantitatives. PUG, coll. Politique en plus.
Bryman, A. “The debate about quantitative and qualitative research”, en: Bryman, A. – (2008). Social Research Methods, 3rd Edition, Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Bryman, A. – Burges. (1999). Qualitative research.London: Sage.
Burnham, P. – Gilland, K. – Grant, W. – Layton-Henry, Z. (2008). Re-search Methods in Politics. 2nd edition, Palgrave Macmillan.
Champagne, P. (mars 1988). “Le cerclepolitique, usagessociaux des sonda-ges et nouvelespacepolitique”, en: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, No. 71-73, pp. 71-98.
Della Porta, D. – Keating, M. (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the Social Sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Déloye, Y. – Voutat, B. (dir.). (2002). Faire de la science politique. Pour uneanalyse socio-historique du politique. Paris: Belin.
Diamond I. – Jefferies, J. (2001). Beginning Statistics: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.Djurkovic, H. – Harris, L. – Hickson, K. – McDonagh, S. Study Politics. A short guide to studying politics at university in the UK. Political Studies Association of the UK.
Dorling, D. – Simpson, S. (1999). Statistics in society: the arithmetic of po-litics. London; New York: Arnold – New York : Oxford University Press.
Easton, D. (1991). “Political Science in the United States: past and pre-sent”, en: The Development of Political Science.Londres, Inglaterra: Rout-ledge.
Elliott, J. (2005). Using Narrative InSocial Research: Qualitative and Quanti-tative Approaches. London: Sage.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edition). London: Sage.
Fielding, J. – Gilbert, N. (2006).Understanding social statistics. London: Sage.
Frognier, A-P. (2002). “Une vue européenne sur la science politique française”, en: Revue française de science politique, 52e année, Nos. 5-6, pp. 641-648.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research. Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Hammersley, M. “Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide”, en: Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods, 3rd Edition, Oxford Univer-sity Press.
Harto de Vera, F. (2005). Ciencia Política y Teoría Política Contemporánea: una relación problemática (Primera Edición.). Madrid: Trotta.
Harrison, L. (2001), Political research: an introduction. London: Routledge.
Henwood, K. – Lang, I. (2005). «Qualitative Social Science in the UK: A Reflexive Commentary on the "State of the Art"», en: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 48. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503486.
Kaufmann, J.-C. (1996). L’entretien compréhensif. Paris: Nathan
King, G. – Keohane, R.O. –Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
Knoblauch, H. – Flick, U. – Maeder, C. (2005). “Qualitative Methods in Europe: The Variety of Social Research”, en: Forum Qualitative Sozialfors-chung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, Art. 34. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503342
Marsh, D. – Stoker, S. (1997). Teoría y métodos de la ciencia política. Ma-drid: Alianza Editorial.
Mason, J. (2006). Qualitative Researching. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
May, T., (2001). Social Research. Issues, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2007). Resolución 466 de 2007.
Pennings, P. –Keman, H. – Kleinnijenhuis, J. (1999). Doing Research in Political Science: An Introduction to Comparative Methods and Statistics. Lon-don: Sage.
Pudal, B. (1994). “Science Politique: des objets canoniques revisités”, en: Sociétés Contemporaines No. 20 (pp. 5-10).
Quivy, R. – Van Campenhoudt, L. (2001). Manualde Investigación en Cien-cias Sociales. Mexico D.F.: Limusa.
Shapiro, I. – Smith, R. – Masoud, T. (eds.) (2004). Problems and Methods in the study of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Vromen, A. (2010). "Debating Methods: Rediscovering Qualitative Aproaches", en: Theory and Methods in Political Science (pp. 249–267). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Angermüller, J. (2005). «"Qualitative" Methods of Social Research in France: Reconstructing the Actor, Deconstructing the Subject», en: Fo-rum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 19. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503194
Blanchet, A. – Ghiglione, R. – Massonnat, J. – Trognon, A., (1989). Téc-nicas de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Narcea, S.A. de ediciones.
Blanchet A. – Gotman A., (2005). L'entretien: L'enquête et ses méthodes. Paris: Armand Colin.
Barrientos del monte, F. (2013). “La Ciencia Política en América Latina. Una breve introducción histórica”, en: Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Vol 20 (Núm 61), 105–133.
Bejarano, A. M., – Wills, M. E. (2005). “La Ciencia Política en Colombia: de vocación a disciplina”, en: Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 111–123.
Blondiaux, L. (1998). La fabrique de l’opinion, une histoire sociale des sonda-ges. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (janvier 1973). “L’opinion publique n’existe pas”, en: Les Temps modernes, No. 318, pp. 1292-1309.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, H. E. – Collier, D. “Political Science Methodology”, en: Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. – Brady, E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Brady, H. E. – Collier, D. (eds.) (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. USA: Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Braud, Ph. (1982). La Science politique. Paris: PUF, Que sais-je?
Bréchon, P. (Dir.) (2011). Enquêtes qualitatives, enquêtes quantitatives. PUG, coll. Politique en plus.
Bryman, A. “The debate about quantitative and qualitative research”, en: Bryman, A. – (2008). Social Research Methods, 3rd Edition, Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Bryman, A. – Burges. (1999). Qualitative research.London: Sage.
Burnham, P. – Gilland, K. – Grant, W. – Layton-Henry, Z. (2008). Re-search Methods in Politics. 2nd edition, Palgrave Macmillan.
Champagne, P. (mars 1988). “Le cerclepolitique, usagessociaux des sonda-ges et nouvelespacepolitique”, en: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, No. 71-73, pp. 71-98.
Della Porta, D. – Keating, M. (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the Social Sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Déloye, Y. – Voutat, B. (dir.). (2002). Faire de la science politique. Pour uneanalyse socio-historique du politique. Paris: Belin.
Diamond I. – Jefferies, J. (2001). Beginning Statistics: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.Djurkovic, H. – Harris, L. – Hickson, K. – McDonagh, S. Study Politics. A short guide to studying politics at university in the UK. Political Studies Association of the UK.
Dorling, D. – Simpson, S. (1999). Statistics in society: the arithmetic of po-litics. London; New York: Arnold – New York : Oxford University Press.
Easton, D. (1991). “Political Science in the United States: past and pre-sent”, en: The Development of Political Science.Londres, Inglaterra: Rout-ledge.
Elliott, J. (2005). Using Narrative InSocial Research: Qualitative and Quanti-tative Approaches. London: Sage.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd edition). London: Sage.
Fielding, J. – Gilbert, N. (2006).Understanding social statistics. London: Sage.
Frognier, A-P. (2002). “Une vue européenne sur la science politique française”, en: Revue française de science politique, 52e année, Nos. 5-6, pp. 641-648.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research. Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Hammersley, M. “Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide”, en: Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods, 3rd Edition, Oxford Univer-sity Press.
Harto de Vera, F. (2005). Ciencia Política y Teoría Política Contemporánea: una relación problemática (Primera Edición.). Madrid: Trotta.
Harrison, L. (2001), Political research: an introduction. London: Routledge.
Henwood, K. – Lang, I. (2005). «Qualitative Social Science in the UK: A Reflexive Commentary on the "State of the Art"», en: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 48. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503486.
Kaufmann, J.-C. (1996). L’entretien compréhensif. Paris: Nathan
King, G. – Keohane, R.O. –Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
Knoblauch, H. – Flick, U. – Maeder, C. (2005). “Qualitative Methods in Europe: The Variety of Social Research”, en: Forum Qualitative Sozialfors-chung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, Art. 34. Tomado de: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503342
Marsh, D. – Stoker, S. (1997). Teoría y métodos de la ciencia política. Ma-drid: Alianza Editorial.
Mason, J. (2006). Qualitative Researching. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
May, T., (2001). Social Research. Issues, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2007). Resolución 466 de 2007.
Pennings, P. –Keman, H. – Kleinnijenhuis, J. (1999). Doing Research in Political Science: An Introduction to Comparative Methods and Statistics. Lon-don: Sage.
Pudal, B. (1994). “Science Politique: des objets canoniques revisités”, en: Sociétés Contemporaines No. 20 (pp. 5-10).
Quivy, R. – Van Campenhoudt, L. (2001). Manualde Investigación en Cien-cias Sociales. Mexico D.F.: Limusa.
Shapiro, I. – Smith, R. – Masoud, T. (eds.) (2004). Problems and Methods in the study of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Vromen, A. (2010). "Debating Methods: Rediscovering Qualitative Aproaches", en: Theory and Methods in Political Science (pp. 249–267). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Article Sidebar
Published
Nov 28, 2013
Article Details
How to Cite
Angel Baquero, S., & Barrero Escobar, F. A. (2013). Political science and its methods: a comparison among the programs of social sciences in colombia. Co-Herencia, 10(19), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.10.19.8
Issue
Section
Articles
Supporting Agencies
Author Biographies
Sergio Angel Baquero, Universidad Sergio Arboleda
Magíster en Estudios Políticos, Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Profesor, Escuela de Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Bogotá, Colombia. Miembro del Grupo de Análisis Político, G.A.P. de la misma Universidad, y del grupo de Investigación Cultura Jurídico-política, instituciones y globalización de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Fredy Andrés Barrero Escobar, Universidad Sergio Arboleda
Investigación Cultura Jurídico-política, instituciones y globalización de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Estudiante de Maestría en Estudios Políticos, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Decano Adjunto, Escuela de Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Sergio Arboleda-Bogotá, Colombia. Miembro del Grupo de Análisis Político, G.A.P. de la misma Universidad.Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
