Horizontal interdisciplinarity. The economic, social, political and legal ways of constructing realities
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
This short essay argues that instead of having a given hierarchy among disciplines of human knowledge, there is a changing and multifarious construction of such disciplines. This may be seen in the way in which disciplines such as economy, sociology, political science and law have built specific understandings of reality as a whole, to the point that it is possible to refer to economic, social, political or legal manners of construction of reality. This leads to the notion of horizontal interdisciplinarity, given the fact that disciplines of human understanding are all capable of building knowledge and of forging new and different epistemic frontiers.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Althusser, Louis (1971). “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses”. En: Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays (pp. 127-86). Nueva York y Londres: Monthly Review Press.
Arendt, Hannah ([1969] 2005). Sobre la violencia. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
Berger, Peter y Thomas Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Re-ality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Press.
Bernstein, Richard (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Faber, Jan y Willem Scheper (1997). “Interdisciplinary social science: a methodological analysis”. En: Quality & Quantity, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 37-56.
Jean-Klein, Iris y Annelise Riles (2005). “Anthropology and Human Rights Administrations: Expert Observation and Representation after the Fact”. En: PoLAR, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 173-202.
Kelsen, Hans ([1949] 1988). Teoría general del derecho y del Estado. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Kelsen, Hans ([1934] 2009). Teoría pura del derecho. Buenos Aires: Edito-rial Eudeba.
Kuhn, Thomas ([1962] 1996). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: F. C. E.
Lukács, Georg ([1923] 1988). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marx, Karl ([1875] 1969). Crítica del programa de Gotha. Bogotá: Círculo rojo editores.
Packer, Martin (2013). La ciencia de la investigación cualitativa. Bogotá: Edi-ciones Uniandes.
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1968). Palabra y objeto. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.
Restrepo, Esteban, Isabel Cristina Jaramillo y Mauricio García (eds.) (2005). Crítica jurídica: teoría y sociología jurídica en los Estados Unidos. Bo-gotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
Riles, Annelise (1994). “Representing in-between: law, anthropology, and the rhetoric of interdisciplinarity”. En: University of Illinois Law Review, No. 3, pp. 597-650.
Schmitt, Carl ([1932] 2009). El concepto de lo político. Madrid: Alianza Edi-torial.
Searle, John (1997). The Construction of Social Reality. Nueva York: Free Press.
Von Mises, Richard (1956). Positivism: A study in human understanding. Nueva York: George Braziller Inc.
Arendt, Hannah ([1969] 2005). Sobre la violencia. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
Berger, Peter y Thomas Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Re-ality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Press.
Bernstein, Richard (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Faber, Jan y Willem Scheper (1997). “Interdisciplinary social science: a methodological analysis”. En: Quality & Quantity, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 37-56.
Jean-Klein, Iris y Annelise Riles (2005). “Anthropology and Human Rights Administrations: Expert Observation and Representation after the Fact”. En: PoLAR, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 173-202.
Kelsen, Hans ([1949] 1988). Teoría general del derecho y del Estado. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Kelsen, Hans ([1934] 2009). Teoría pura del derecho. Buenos Aires: Edito-rial Eudeba.
Kuhn, Thomas ([1962] 1996). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: F. C. E.
Lukács, Georg ([1923] 1988). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marx, Karl ([1875] 1969). Crítica del programa de Gotha. Bogotá: Círculo rojo editores.
Packer, Martin (2013). La ciencia de la investigación cualitativa. Bogotá: Edi-ciones Uniandes.
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1968). Palabra y objeto. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.
Restrepo, Esteban, Isabel Cristina Jaramillo y Mauricio García (eds.) (2005). Crítica jurídica: teoría y sociología jurídica en los Estados Unidos. Bo-gotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
Riles, Annelise (1994). “Representing in-between: law, anthropology, and the rhetoric of interdisciplinarity”. En: University of Illinois Law Review, No. 3, pp. 597-650.
Schmitt, Carl ([1932] 2009). El concepto de lo político. Madrid: Alianza Edi-torial.
Searle, John (1997). The Construction of Social Reality. Nueva York: Free Press.
Von Mises, Richard (1956). Positivism: A study in human understanding. Nueva York: George Braziller Inc.
Article Sidebar
Published
Jun 27, 2016
Article Details
How to Cite
Barreto Rozo, A. (2016). Horizontal interdisciplinarity. The economic, social, political and legal ways of constructing realities. Co-Herencia, 13(24), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.13.24.2
Issue
Section
Articles
Supporting Agencies
Author Biography
Antonio Barreto Rozo, Universidad de los Andes
Profesor, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá-Colombia. Magíster y Doctor en Derecho Constitucional, Universidad de Yale-Estados Unidos.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
