The resurrection of the author in current French literary criticism (2008-2011). The case of Pierre Bayard’s re-attribution criticism
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pierre Bayard, Author, Bayard, hermeneutics, relativism, reference framework.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyse the concept of author which can be derived from the essays of the French literary critic Pierre Bayard, in the context of the various resurrections of the author that have occurred since Roland Barthes’s authorial death sentence in 1968. To this end, two problems will be considered which have been present in the reflection of literary theory on the author issue, midway between what Bayard named hermeneutics and relativism: the transcendentalization of the literary experience and the interpretative anarchy. In turn, these two problems will lead to query the place occupied by the author within the reference framework of the text and how it conditions the reading experience.
Downloads
References
Bayard. P. (2002). Enquête sur Hamlet. Paris: Minuit.
Bayard. P. (2007). Comment parler des livres que l’on n’a pas lus? Paris: Minuit.
Bayard. P. (2009). Le plagiat par anticipation. Paris: Minuit.
Bayard. P. (2010). Et si les œuvres changeaient d’auteur ? Paris: Minuit.
Bayard, P. (2017). L’énigme Tolstoïevski. Paris: Minuit.
Bellemin-Noël, J. (1985). L’auteur encombrant: Stendhal/Ambran. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Bloom, H. (1997). The Anxiety of Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booth, W. C. (1983). The Retoric of Fiction (2a ed). Chicago-London: Chicago University Press.
Borges, J. L. (1998). Ficciones. Madrid: Alianza.
Braudel, F. (1993). La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II, Tome 1. La Part du milieu. Paris: Poche.
Burke, J. (1989). The Death and Return of the Author. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh.
Couturier, M. (1995). La figure de l’auteur. Paris: Seuil.
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (1994 [1969]). Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur? En Dits et écrits (Tomo I). Paris: Gallimard.
Garayalde, N. (2014). Las conveniencias de la no-lectura. Córdoba: Alción.
Garayalde, N. (2018). La lectura del tiempo en la obra de Pierre Bayard. Çedille, revista de estudios franceses, 14, 221-243.
Genette, G. (1982). Palimpsestes. La littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil.
Holland, N. (1973). Poems in persons. New York: The Northon Library.
Holland, N. (1975). Hamlet -my Greatest Creation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 3(4), 419- 427.
Holland, N. (1985). The I. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Iser, W. (1987). El acto de leer. Madrid: Taurus.
Jauss, H. R. (1987).El lector como instancia de una nueva historia de la literatura. En J. A. Mayoral (Comp.), Estética de la recepción (pp. 59-85). Madrid: Arco Libros.
Jones, E. (1957). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books.
Jouve, V. (2008). Auteur et littérarité. Cycnos, 14(2). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Lgczro
Kuhn, T. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: F. C. E.
Lacan, J. (2006). El seminario. Libro XX. Aún. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lawrence, D. H. (2012 [1928]). El amante de lady Chatterley. Madrid: Alianza.
Lawrence, T. E. (1989 [1926]). Los siete pilares de la sabiduría: Madrid: Jucar.
Lecercle, J.-J. (2008). Lire Couturier. Cycnos, 14(2). Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2JPPuGk
Looney, T. (2010 [1920]). “Shakespeare” identified in Edward De Vere, the seventeenth Earl of Oxford. Memphis, Tenn: General Books LLC.
Nehamas, A. (1987). Writter, Text, Work, Author. En A. Cascardi (Ed.), Literature and the Question of Philosophy (pp. 267-291). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Ocampo, V. (2013 [1963]). 338171 T. E. Lawrence de Arabia. Buenos Aires: Letemendia.
Rabau, S. (2011). Lire contre l’auteur. Paris: PUV.
Rolph, C. H. (2005 [1961]). Lady Chatterley’s Trial. Regina v. Penguin Books Limited:the transcript of the trial. London: Penguin Books.
Stewart, D. (1977). T. E. Lawrence. London: Granada Publishing Limited.
Topuzian, M. (2014). Muerte y resurrección del autor (1963-2005). Santa Fe: UNL.
Vernet, M. (2011). L’auteur en soupçon: déjouer la fiction d’autorité. En S. Rabau (Ed.), Lire contre l’auteur (pp. 99-115). Paris: PUV
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Nicolás Garayalde, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Doctor en Letras. Profesor en la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
