High corruption: strategies to avoid international impunity

Main Article Content

Esther Hava García

Keywords

High corruption, Impunity, Crimes against Humanity, International Criminal Law, International jurisdiction, International Criminal Court

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the arguments for and against including the most serious cases of corruption within the jurisdiction of the ICC. The purpose is to suggest a realistic strategy for advancing towards the goal of preventing impunity in such cases. It therefore begins with a presentation of the problems posed by the concept of “High corruption” itself, as well as its classification as a discrete crime. Next, there is a brief exposition of the principle weaknesses in the theories proposing that the most serious cases of High corruption be considered crimes against humanity. This is followed by a description of the strategy judged most appropriate for the purpose in mind, i.e. including the factors that characterise High corruption among the essential criteria for confirming the jurisdiction of the ICC in respect of a specific situation or case, as well as for deciding the penalty to be imposed on those guilty of such crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 2112 | PDF (Español) Downloads 1619

References

AMBOS, K., “El test de complementariedad de la Corte Penal Internacional (artículo 17 Estatuto de Roma)”, Indret., nº 2, 2010.
BLOOM, B., “Criminalizing Kleptocracy? The ICC As a Viable Tool in the Fight Against Grand Corruption”, American University International Law Review, Vol. 29, nº 3, 2014.
DE BONO, E., The use of lateral thinking, London, Cape, 1967.
FEDERACIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHOS HUMANOS, La Fiscalía de la Corte Penal Internacional 9 años después, diciembre de 2011, n°579e, [http://fidh.org/IMG/pdf/cpiprocespagnol-2.pdf].
GOPAC, Declaración de 27 de noviembre de 2013, surgida en el marco del V Foro de Parlamentarios: Los legisladores nacionales y el derecho internacional en la lucha por la rendición de cuentas, Panamá, 25-29 de noviembre 2013 [http://www.gopacnetwork.org/Docs/Declaration%20for%20Fifth%20Forum%20of%20Parliamentarians_ES.pdf].
GOPAC, Juzgando la Gran corrupción como delito internacional, Documento de debate presentado en el Foro de Parlamentarios celebrado durante la Conferencia de los Estados Parte (CdEP) en la UNCAC en Panamá, en noviembre de 2013.
HASSEMER, W., “La persecución penal: legalidad y oportunidad”, Jueces para la Democracia, Núm. 4, 1988.
HUMPHREYS, M./SACHS, J. D./STIGLITZ, J. E. (eds.), Escaping the Resource Curse, Columbia University Press, 2007 [http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/mia/users/Rachelle_Cloutier/public/International%20Energy/Escapinging%20Resource%20Curse.pdf].
MUÑOZ CONDE, F./GARCÍA ARÁN, M., Derecho Penal. Parte General, Tirant lo Blanch, 8ª ed., Valencia, 2010.
IVORY, R., Corruption, Asset Recovery, and the Protection of Property in Public International Law. The Human Rights of Bad Guys, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
OLÁSOLO ALONSO, H., El principio de complementariedad y las Estrategias de Actuación de la Corte Penal Internacional en la Fase de Examen preliminar: ¿Por qué la Corte Penal Internacional mantiene su Examen preliminar, pero no abre una Investigación, sobre la situación en Colombia?, 2012 [https://www.upeace.org/OKN/collection/cortepenal/Olasoloformatted.pdf].
OLÁSOLO ALONSO, H./CARNERO ROJO, E., “Aplicación práctica del análisis de admisibilidad de situaciones: la situación en la República de Kenia”, en H. Olásolo Alonso y S. Cuenca Curbelo (coords.), Perspectiva Iberoamericana sobre la Justicia Penal Internacional, Vol. I, 2011.
STARR, S. B., “Extraordinary Crimes at Ordinary Times: International Justice Beyond Crisis Situations”, Harvard Public Law Working Paper, nº 113, 2007.
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL, Estrategia 2015, aprobada en la Reunión Anual de Miembros celebrada en Bangkok en noviembre de 2010 [http://www.transparency.org/files/content/ourorganisation/TI_Strategy_2015_ES.pdf].
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL, Guía de lenguaje claro sobre lucha contra la corrupción, 2009 [http://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/pub/guia_de_lenguaje_claro_sobre_lucha_contra_la_corrupcion].
U4 ANTI-CORRUPTION RESOURCE CENTRE, Glossary: Bureacratic corruption [http://www.u4.no/glossary/].
UGAZ, J., “La politización de las campañas anticorrupción”. The International Council on Human Rights Policy. Review Meeting. Corruption and Human Rights. Geneva, 28-29 July 2007, p. 2 [http://www.ichrp.org/files/papers/129/131_-_Jos__C._Ugaz_S.M._-_2007_-_ES.pdf].
UNITED NATIONS, Report of the Panel of Experts on Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the Democratic Republic of Congo, New York, United Nations Security Council, April 12, 2001.
UNODC/WB, Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative: Challenges, Opportunities, and Action Plan, Washington, 2007 [http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/Star-rep-full.pdf].
UNODC, Guía legislativa para la aplicación de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra la Corrupción, Segunda edición revisada, julio de 2012, Sección de Servicios en Inglés, Publicaciones y Biblioteca de la Oficina de la ONU en Viena, p. 9 [http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/LegislativeGuide/UNCAC_Legislative_Guide_S.pdf].
VLASSENROOT, K./RAEYMAEKERS, T., The Formation of New Political Complexes: Dynamics of Conflict in Ituri -Democratic Republic of Congo-, Centre of African Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2003.
WEBB, P., “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: Global Achievement or Missed Opportunity?”, Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 2005.
WORLD BANK, The Costs of Corruption [http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20190187~menuPK:34457~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html].
ZAPICO BARBEITO, M., El crimen de agresión y la Corte Penal Internacional [http://www.defensesociale.org/xvcongreso/pdf/cfp/17)_Crimen_de_agresion_y_Corte_Penal_Internacional_Zapico.pdf].

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español)
DOI https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp.12.87.2

Article Details

How to Cite
Hava García, E. (2016). High corruption: strategies to avoid international impunity. Nuevo Foro Penal, 12(87), 60–98. https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp.12.87.2
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 87 (2016): Julio-Diciembre
Section
Studies
Supporting Agencies

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).