Persuasion, freedom of expression and criminal law
Main Article Content
Keywords
Freedom of expression. Criminal Law. Public communication
Abstract
This article carries out an analysis or a typology of four different ways of regulating criminally public and persuasive communications that carry messages that incite the performance of one or more actions that can be considered as harmful and illicit. In conducting this analysis, the article teaches different levels of appreciation of the importance or value of being able to provide enhanced constitutional protection for free expression
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
BALKIN, JACK: Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society, en: N.Y.U. L. Rev. 79 (2004), 1-58.
BARENDT, ERIC: Freedom of speech, 2.ª, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
BARRON, RICHARD: Free Speech and the Social Technologies of Democracy, Scientific Inquiry and the Free Market, en: Golash (ed.), Freedom of Expression in a diverse world, Spinger, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York 2010, 3-11.
BENHABIB, SEYLA: Los Derechos de los otros: extranjeros, residentes y ciudadanos (Trad. de: Zadunaisky, Gabriel), Gedisa, Barcelona, 2005.
BENHABIB, SEYLA: El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea: Feminismo, comunitarismo y posmodernismo (Trad. de: Zadunaisky, Gabriel), Gedisa, Barcelona, 2006.
BERLIN, ISAIAH: Cuatro ensayos sobre la libertad (Trad. de: Urrutia, Belen/Bayón, Julio/Rodríguez Salmones, Natalia), Alianza, Madrid, 1988.
BEVIER, LILLIAN: The First Amendment and Political Speech: An Inquiry into the Substance and Limits of Principle, en: Stan. L. Rev. 30 (1978), 299-358.
BHAGWAT, ASHUTOSH: The myth of Rights: the purposes and limits of constitutional rights, Oxford, Nueva York, 2010.
BHAGWAT, ASHUTOSH: Free Speech Without Democracy, en: U.C. Davis L. Rev. 49 (2015), 59-121.
BISBAL TORRES, MARTA: La Libertad de expresión en el pensamiento liberal: John Stuart Mill y Oliver Wendell Holmes, Tesis doctoral inédita, dirigida por Carmelo Gómez Torres, Universitat de Lleida. Departament de Dret Públic, 2005.
BLASI, VINCENT: The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory, en: Am. B. Found. Res. J. (1977), 521-649.
BLASI, VINCENT: The Pathological Perspective and the First Amendment, en: Colum. L. Rev. 85 (1985), 449-514.
BLASI, VINCENT: Learned Hand and the Self-Government Theory of the First Amendment: Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 61 (1990), 1-37.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO: Democracia y pluralismo, en: RCP 1-2 (1986), 127-137.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO: El futuro de la democracia (Trad. de: Fernández Santillán, José), Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1986.
BOLLINGER, LEE/STONE, GEOFFREY: Dialogue, en: Bollinger/Stone (eds.), Eternally Vigilant. Free speech in the modern era, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002, 1-31.
BORK, ROBERT: Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems, en: Ind. L.J. 47 (1971), 1-35.
BRADDON-MITCHELL, DAVID/WEST, CAROLINE: What is Free Speech?, en: J. Political Philos. 12 (2004), 437-460.
BRISON, SUSAN: The autonomy defense of free speech, en: Ethics 108 (1998), 312-339.
BRISON, SUSAN: Speech, harm, and the mind-body problem in first amendment jurisprudence, en: Legal Theory 4 (1998), 39-61.
CASTRO-GÓMEZ, SANTIAGO: Revoluciones sin sujeto. Slavoj Žižek y la crítica del historicismo posmoderno. Akal, Ciudad de México, 2015.
CASTORIADIS, CORNELIUS: Los Dominios del hombre. Las encrucijadas del laberinto, 3.ª, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1995.
CAUTE, DAVID: The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1978.
CEPLAIR, LARRY/ENGLUND, STEVEN: The Inquisition in Hollywood. Politics in the film community, 1930-60, University of Illinois Press, Illinois, 1979.
CHAFEE, ZECHARIAH, Jr: Freedom of speech in war time, en: Harv. L. Rev. 32 (1918-1919), 932-973.
CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN: Constitutional Law, 3.ª, Aspen, Nueva York, 2006.
COHEN, JOSHUA: Freedom of Expression, en: Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1996, 173-225.
COLOM, FRANCISCO: Razones de identidad: Pluralismo cultural e integración política, Anthropos, Barcelona, 1998.
DAHL, ROBERT: La democracia. Una guía para los ciudadanos (Trad. de: Vallespín, Fernando), Taurus, México, 2006.
DELGADO, RICHARD/MILLEN, DAVID: God, Galileo, and Government: Toward Protection for Scientific Inquiry, en: Wash. L. Rev. 53 (1978), 349-404.
DUVAL, BENJAMIN: Free Communication of Ideas and the Quest for Truth: Toward a Teleological Approach to First Amendment Adjudication, en: Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 41 (1972), 161-259.
DWORKIN, RONALD: Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Nueva York, 1977.
DWORKIN, RONALD: Foreword, en: Hare/Weinstein (eds.), Extreme Speech and democracy, Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford, 2009, v-ix.
EMERSON, THOMAS: Toward a general theory of the first amendment, Random House, Nueva York, 1966.
EMERSON, THOMAS: First Amendment Doctrine and the Burger Court, en: Cal. L. Rev. 68 (1980), 422-481.
FAIGMAN, DAVID: Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles Versus Supreme Court Practice, en: Va. L. Rev. 78 (1992), 1521-1580.
FALLON, RICHARD: The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice, 2.ª, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 2013.
FARBER, DANIEL A.: The Categorical Approach to Protecting Speech in American Constitutional Law, en: Ind. L.J. 84 (2009), 917-938.
FERRAJOLI, LUIGI: Derecho y razón. Teoría del garantismo penal (Ibáñez, Perfecto Andrés/Ruiz Miguel, Alfonso/Bayón Mohino, Juan Carlos/Terradillos Basoco, Juan/ Cantarero Bandrés, Rocío) Trotta, Madrid, 1995.
FICHTE, JOHANN: Reivindicación de la libertad de pensamiento y otros escritos políticos (Trad. de Oncina Coves, Faustino). Tecnos, Madrid, 1986.
FRANCIONE, GARY: Experimentation and the Marketplace Theory of the First Amendment, en: U. Pa. L. Rev. 136 (1987), 417-512.
FUCHS, ALAN: Further Steps Toward a General Theory of Freedom of Expression, en: Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 18 (1976), 347-377.
GARCÍA VILLEGAS, MAURICIO: La democracia constitucional: entre la libertad y la igualdad, en: Estudios Políticos 7-8, (1996), 121-146.
GARDNER, JAMES: Shut Up and Vote: A Critique of Deliberative Democracy and the Life of Talk, en: Tenn. L. Rev. 63 (1996), 421-451.
GAVIRIA, CARLOS: ¿Qué es el tercer estado?» de Siéyes, y el constitucionalismo colombiano, en: Estudios Políticos 1 (1992), 29-33.
GEY, STEVEN, The First Amendment and the Dissemination of Socially Worthless Untruths, en: Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 36 (2008), 1-22.
GREENAWALT, KENT: Speech, Crime, and the Uses of Language, Oxford University Press, Nueva York-Oxford, 1989.
GREENAWALT, KENT: Free Speech Justifications, en: Colum. L. Rev. 89 (1989), 119-155.
HART ELY, JOHN: Flag desecration: A case study in the roles of categorization and balancing in First Amendment and analysis, en: Harv. L. Rev. 88 (1974-1975), 1482-1508.
HELD, DAVID: Modelos de democracia, Alianza, Madrid, 1992.
HORWITZ, PAUL: The First Amendment's Epistemological Problem, en: Wash. L. Rev. 87 (2012), 445-493.
KAGAN, ELENA: Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine, en: U. Chi. L. Rev. 63 (1996), 413-517.
KALVEN, HARRY: The Reasonable Man and the First Amendment: Hill, Butts, and Walker, en: Sup. Ct. Rev. (1967), 267-310.
KANT, IMMANUEL: Respuesta a la pregunta “¿Qué es la ilustración?”, en: Erhard/Freiherr von Moser/Garve/Geich/Herder/Kant/Gotthold//Lessing/Riem/Schiller/Wieland/Zöllner/Hamann, ¿Qué es la Ilustración? 5.ª, Tecnos, Madrid, 2007, 17-25.
KLEHR, HARVEY/HAYNES, JOHN/FIRSIV, FRIDRIKH: The Secret World of American Communism, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1995.
KOPPELMAN, ANDREW: Veil of Ignorance: Tunnel Constructivism in Free Speech Theory, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 107 (2013), 647-730.
KYMLICKA, WILL: Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance, en Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1996, 81-105.
LAW, DAVID/VERSTEEG, MILA: Sham Constitutions, en: Calif. L. Rev. 101 (2013), 863-952.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Democracy and political theory (Trad. de: Macey, David), University of Minessota Press, Gran Bretaña, 1988.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Thinking with and against Hannah Arendt, en: Social Research 69 (2002), 447-459.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: El arte de escribir y lo político, Herder, Barcelona, 2007.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Maquiavelo. Lecturas de lo político, Trotta, Madrid, 2010.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Democracia y representación, Prometeo, Buenos Aires, 2011.
MASSARO, TONI/NORTON, HELEN: Seriously? Free speech rights and artificial intelligence, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 110 (2016), 1169-1194.
MASSEY, CALVIN: Hate Speech, Cultural Diversity, and the Foundational Paradigms of Free Expression, en: UCLA L. Rev. 40 (1992), 103-197.
MILL, JOHN STUART: Sobre la libertad (Trad. de: de Azcárate y Flórez, Pablo), Alianza, Madrid, 2004.
MOUFFE, CHANTAL: El retorno de lo político: comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical, Paidós, Barcelona, 1999.
MURCHISON, BRIAN: Speech and the Truth-Seeking Value, en: Colum. J.L. & Arts 55 (2015), 55-117.
NAGEL, ROBERT: How Useful Is Judicial Review in Free Speech Cases, en: Cornell L. Rev. 69 (1984), 302-340.
NAGEL, THOMAS: Personal Rights and Public Space, en: Phil. Pub. Aff. 24 (1995), 83-107.
NICKEL, JAMES: Freedom of expression in a pluralistic society, en: Law & Phil 7 (1988-1989), 281-293.
NIMMER, MELVILLE: The Right to Speak from Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy, en: Cal. L. Rev. 56 (1968), 935- 967.
NINO, CARLOS SANTIAGO: Fundamentos de Derecho constitucional. Análisis filosófico, jurídico y politológico en la práctica judicial, Astrea, Buenos Aires, 1992.
OSBORNE, RAQUEL: ¿Son las mujeres una minoría?, en: Isegoría 14 (1996), 79-93.
OSHINSKY, DAVID: A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 1983.
PINKER, STEVEN: En defensa de la ilustración. Por la razón, la ciencia, el humanismo y el progreso (Trad. de: Hermida Lazcano, Pablo), Paidós, Barcelona, 2018.
POST, ROBERT: Meiklejohn's Mistake: Individual Autonomy and the Reform of Public Discourse, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 64 (1993), 1109-1137.
POST, ROBERT: Reconciling Theory and Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence en: Bollinger/Stone (eds.), Eternally Vigilant. Free speech in the modern era, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002, 120-151.
PRESNO LINERA, MIGUEL ÁNGEL/TERUEL LOZANO, GERMÁN: Libertad de expresión en América y Europa, Juruá Editora, Vila Nova de Gaia/Porto, 2017.
RABBAN, DAVID: The First Amendment in Its Forgotten Years, en: Yale L.J. 90 (1981), 514-595.
RABBAN, DAVID: The State Of Free Speech Doctrine In 1917, en: Ariz. St. L. J. 50 (2018), 911-918.
RAZ, JOSEPH: Free Expression and Personal Identification, en: Oxford J. Legal Stud. 11 (1991), 303-324.
REMUS IRWIN, DANA: Freedom of Thought: The First Amendment and the Scientific Method, en: Wis. L. Rev. (2005), 1479-1533.
RODRÍGUEZ MONTAÑÉS, MARÍA TERESA: Libertad de expresión, discurso extremo y delito una aproximación desde la Constitución a las fronteras del derecho penal, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2012.
ROGIN, MICHAEL: The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1967.
SARTORI, GIOVANI: Democracia en treinta lecciones (Trad. de: Pradera, Alejandro), Taurus, México, 2009.
SCANLON, THOMAS: A Theory of Freedom of expression, en: Phil. Pub. Aff. 1 (1972), 204-226.
SCANLON, THOMAS: The difficulty of Tolerance, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 2003.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Response: Pornography and the first amendment, en: U. Pitt. L. Rev. 40 (1979) 605-618.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Free speech: A Philosophical Enquiry, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 1982.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Must Speech Be Special?, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 78 (1983-1984), 1284-1306.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Role of the People in First Amendment Theory, en: Cal. L. Rev. 74 (1986), 761-788.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Commercial Speech and the Architecture of the First Amendment, en: U. Cin. L. Rev. 56 (1988), 1181-1204.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Second-Best First Amendment, en: Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 31 (1989), 1-23.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Sociology of the Hate Speech Debate, en: Vill. L. Rev. 37 (1992), 805-819.
SCHRECKER, ELLEN: The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents, St. Martin's Press, Boston, 1986.
SHIFFRIN, SEANA: A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech, en: Const. Comment. 27 (2011), 283-307.
SHIFFRIN, STEVEN: Dissent, Democratic Participation, and First Amendment Methodology, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 559-565.
SOLUM, LAWRENCE: Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 83 (1988-1989), 54-135.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Autonomy and Distrust, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 64 (1993), 1171-1178.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Content-Neutral Restrictions, en: U. Chi. L. Rev. 54 (1987), 46-118.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: The Origins of the Bad Tendency Test: Free Speech in Wartime, en: Sup. Ct. Rev. (2002), 411-453.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Perilous Times: Free Speech in War Time From the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism, W.W. Norton & Company, Nueva York, 2004.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Free Speech in the Twenty-First Century: Ten Lessons from the Twentieth Century, en: Pepp. L. Rev. 36 (2008-2009), 273-299.
STONE, GEOFFREY R./SEIDMAN, LOUIS M./SUNSTEIN, CASS/TUSHNET, MARK/KARLAN, PAMELA S., The First Amendment, 2.ª, Aspen, Estados Unidos de América, 2003.
STROSSEN, NADINE: Hate Speech and Pornography: Do We Have to Choose between Freedom of Speech and Equality?, en: Cas. W. Res. L. Rev. 46 (1996), 449-478.
STRAUSS, DAVID: Persuasion, Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression, en: Colum. L. Rev. 91 (1991), 334-371.
SUNSTEIN, CASS: Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech, The Free Press, Nueva York, 1995.
SUNSTEIN, CASS: Designing democracy. What Constitutions Do, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
TARODO SORIA, SALVADOR: Estudio Preliminar: Hacia un Estudio Constitucional de la Libertad de Producción y Creación Artística y Literaria, en: Díaz y García Conlledo/García Amado/Junieles Acosta/Tarodo Soria, (coords.), Libertad de expresión y sentimientos religiosos, Juruá, Curitiba 2012, 17-34.
TAYLOR, CHARLES: The politics of recognition, en: Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism examining and the Politics of Recognition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994, 25-74.
TEN CATE, IRENE: Speech, Truth, and Freedom: An Examination of John Stuart Mill's and Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes's Free Speech Defenses, en: Yale J. L. & Human. 22 (2010), 35-81.
TODOROV, TZVETAN: A Passion for Democracy - Benjamin Constant, Algora, Estados Unidos de América, 1999.
TUSHNET, The Coverage/Protection Distinction in the Law of Freedom of Speech—An Essay on Meta-Doctrine in Constitutional, en: Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 25 (2017).
URBINATI, NADIA: Representative Democracy: Principies and genealogy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006.
URIBE BARRERA, JUAN PABLO: Bases para la interpretación y aplicación del derecho constitucional a la libertad de expresión, tesis doctoral inédita dirigida por: Díaz y García Conlledo, Universidad de León, 2019
VIVES ANTÓN, TOMÁS: La libertad como pretexto, Tirant lo Blanc, Valencia, 1995.
WEINSTEIN, JAMES: Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 491-514.
WEINSTEIN, JAMES: The Story of Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten: Judge Learned Hand, First Amendment Prophet en: Garnett/Koppelman (eds.), First Amendment Stories, 2011, 61-97.
WERHAN, KEITH: Freedom of speech: A reference guide of the United States Constitution, Praeger, Westport, 2004.
WILLIAMS, SUSAN: Democracy, Freedom of Speech, and Feminist Theory: A Response to Post and Weinstein, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 603-616.
WILLIAMS, SUSAN: Content Discrimination and the First Amendment, en: U. Pa. L. Rev. 139 (1990-1991), 615-730.
Jurisprudencia
Corte Suprema y otras cortes de los Estados Unidos de América
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten 244 F 535 (S D NY 1917).
Abrams v. US 250 U.S. 616 (1919);
Frohwerk v. United States, U.S. 204 (1919), 249;
Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47 (1919), 52;
Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)
DeJonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353 (1937)
West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949)
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952)
Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109 (1959)
Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431 (1961)
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 23 (1971)
Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973)
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), 927 s.;
Herceg v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 814 F. 2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1987)
Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N. Y. State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105 (1991)
Ashcroft et. al. v. Free Speech Coalition et. al., 535 U.S. 234 (2002), 252
Corte Constitucional de Colombia
Sentencia T-104/1996, de 8 de marzo.
Sentencia T-213/2003, de 8 de marzo.
Sentencia T-391/2007, de 22 de mayo.
Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Caso Handyside v. United Kingdom, 7 de diciembre 1976.
Caso The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom, 29 de marzo 1979.
Caso Barthold v. Germany, 25 de marzo 1985.
Caso Lingens v. Austria, 8 de julio 1986.
Caso Müller y otros v. Switzerland, 24 de mayo 1988.
Caso Castells v. España, 23 de abril 1992.
Caso Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Islandia, 22 de junio de 1992.
Caso Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, 20 de 1994.
Caso Pavel Ivanov v. Rusia, 18 de diciembre de 1996.
Caso Lehideux y Isorni v. France, 23 de septiembre de 1998.
Caso Dichand y otros v. Austria, 26 de febrero de 2002.
Caso Perna v. Italy, 6 de mayo de 2003.
Caso Scharsach y News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, 13 de febrero de 2004.
Caso Giniewski v. Francia, 31 de abril de 2006.
Caso Soulas y otros v. Francia, 10 de octubre de 2008.
Caso Yurdatapan v. Turquia, 8 de enero de 2008.
Caso Otegi Mondragon v. España, 15 de marzo de 2011.
Caso Affaire Perinçek v. Suisse, 15 de octubre de 2015.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
Caso Ivcher Bronstein v. Brasil, 6 de febrero de 2001.
Caso de “La Última Tentación de Cristo” (Olmedo Bustos y otros) v. Chile, 5 de febrero de 2001.
Caso Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay, 31 de agosto de 2004.
Caso Herrera Ulloa v. Costa Rica, 2 de julio de 2004.
Caso Palamara Iribarne v. Chile, 22 de noviembre de 2005.
Caso Claude Reyes y otros v. Chile, 19 de septiembre de 2006.
Caso Perozo y otros v. Venezuela, 28 de enero de 2009.
Caso Ríos y otros v. Venezuela, 28 de enero de 2009.
Caso López Lone y otros v. Honduras,5 de octubre de 2015.
Caso Granier y otros (Radio Caracas Televisión) v. Venezuela, 22 de junio de 2015.
Caso Lagos del Campo v. Perú, 31 de agosto de 2017.
Otros tribunales
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina, Sentencia de 24 de junio de 2008, Patitó, José Ángel y otro v. Diario La Nación y otros.
Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, Sentencia de 30 de abril de 2009.
Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, de 2 de septiembre de 2010.
Tribunal Constitucional Plurinacional de Bolivia, Sentencia de 20 de septiembre 2012.
Sala Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Costa Rica, Sentencia de 29 de marzo de 2011.
Corte de Constitucionalidad de Guatemala, Sentencia de 1 de febrero de 2006.
Corte de Constitucionalidad de Guatemala, Sentencia de 14 de septiembre de 2010.
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación de México, Sentencia de 17 de junio de 2009.
BARENDT, ERIC: Freedom of speech, 2.ª, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
BARRON, RICHARD: Free Speech and the Social Technologies of Democracy, Scientific Inquiry and the Free Market, en: Golash (ed.), Freedom of Expression in a diverse world, Spinger, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York 2010, 3-11.
BENHABIB, SEYLA: Los Derechos de los otros: extranjeros, residentes y ciudadanos (Trad. de: Zadunaisky, Gabriel), Gedisa, Barcelona, 2005.
BENHABIB, SEYLA: El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea: Feminismo, comunitarismo y posmodernismo (Trad. de: Zadunaisky, Gabriel), Gedisa, Barcelona, 2006.
BERLIN, ISAIAH: Cuatro ensayos sobre la libertad (Trad. de: Urrutia, Belen/Bayón, Julio/Rodríguez Salmones, Natalia), Alianza, Madrid, 1988.
BEVIER, LILLIAN: The First Amendment and Political Speech: An Inquiry into the Substance and Limits of Principle, en: Stan. L. Rev. 30 (1978), 299-358.
BHAGWAT, ASHUTOSH: The myth of Rights: the purposes and limits of constitutional rights, Oxford, Nueva York, 2010.
BHAGWAT, ASHUTOSH: Free Speech Without Democracy, en: U.C. Davis L. Rev. 49 (2015), 59-121.
BISBAL TORRES, MARTA: La Libertad de expresión en el pensamiento liberal: John Stuart Mill y Oliver Wendell Holmes, Tesis doctoral inédita, dirigida por Carmelo Gómez Torres, Universitat de Lleida. Departament de Dret Públic, 2005.
BLASI, VINCENT: The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory, en: Am. B. Found. Res. J. (1977), 521-649.
BLASI, VINCENT: The Pathological Perspective and the First Amendment, en: Colum. L. Rev. 85 (1985), 449-514.
BLASI, VINCENT: Learned Hand and the Self-Government Theory of the First Amendment: Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 61 (1990), 1-37.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO: Democracia y pluralismo, en: RCP 1-2 (1986), 127-137.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO: El futuro de la democracia (Trad. de: Fernández Santillán, José), Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1986.
BOLLINGER, LEE/STONE, GEOFFREY: Dialogue, en: Bollinger/Stone (eds.), Eternally Vigilant. Free speech in the modern era, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002, 1-31.
BORK, ROBERT: Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems, en: Ind. L.J. 47 (1971), 1-35.
BRADDON-MITCHELL, DAVID/WEST, CAROLINE: What is Free Speech?, en: J. Political Philos. 12 (2004), 437-460.
BRISON, SUSAN: The autonomy defense of free speech, en: Ethics 108 (1998), 312-339.
BRISON, SUSAN: Speech, harm, and the mind-body problem in first amendment jurisprudence, en: Legal Theory 4 (1998), 39-61.
CASTRO-GÓMEZ, SANTIAGO: Revoluciones sin sujeto. Slavoj Žižek y la crítica del historicismo posmoderno. Akal, Ciudad de México, 2015.
CASTORIADIS, CORNELIUS: Los Dominios del hombre. Las encrucijadas del laberinto, 3.ª, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1995.
CAUTE, DAVID: The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1978.
CEPLAIR, LARRY/ENGLUND, STEVEN: The Inquisition in Hollywood. Politics in the film community, 1930-60, University of Illinois Press, Illinois, 1979.
CHAFEE, ZECHARIAH, Jr: Freedom of speech in war time, en: Harv. L. Rev. 32 (1918-1919), 932-973.
CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN: Constitutional Law, 3.ª, Aspen, Nueva York, 2006.
COHEN, JOSHUA: Freedom of Expression, en: Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1996, 173-225.
COLOM, FRANCISCO: Razones de identidad: Pluralismo cultural e integración política, Anthropos, Barcelona, 1998.
DAHL, ROBERT: La democracia. Una guía para los ciudadanos (Trad. de: Vallespín, Fernando), Taurus, México, 2006.
DELGADO, RICHARD/MILLEN, DAVID: God, Galileo, and Government: Toward Protection for Scientific Inquiry, en: Wash. L. Rev. 53 (1978), 349-404.
DUVAL, BENJAMIN: Free Communication of Ideas and the Quest for Truth: Toward a Teleological Approach to First Amendment Adjudication, en: Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 41 (1972), 161-259.
DWORKIN, RONALD: Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Nueva York, 1977.
DWORKIN, RONALD: Foreword, en: Hare/Weinstein (eds.), Extreme Speech and democracy, Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford, 2009, v-ix.
EMERSON, THOMAS: Toward a general theory of the first amendment, Random House, Nueva York, 1966.
EMERSON, THOMAS: First Amendment Doctrine and the Burger Court, en: Cal. L. Rev. 68 (1980), 422-481.
FAIGMAN, DAVID: Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles Versus Supreme Court Practice, en: Va. L. Rev. 78 (1992), 1521-1580.
FALLON, RICHARD: The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice, 2.ª, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 2013.
FARBER, DANIEL A.: The Categorical Approach to Protecting Speech in American Constitutional Law, en: Ind. L.J. 84 (2009), 917-938.
FERRAJOLI, LUIGI: Derecho y razón. Teoría del garantismo penal (Ibáñez, Perfecto Andrés/Ruiz Miguel, Alfonso/Bayón Mohino, Juan Carlos/Terradillos Basoco, Juan/ Cantarero Bandrés, Rocío) Trotta, Madrid, 1995.
FICHTE, JOHANN: Reivindicación de la libertad de pensamiento y otros escritos políticos (Trad. de Oncina Coves, Faustino). Tecnos, Madrid, 1986.
FRANCIONE, GARY: Experimentation and the Marketplace Theory of the First Amendment, en: U. Pa. L. Rev. 136 (1987), 417-512.
FUCHS, ALAN: Further Steps Toward a General Theory of Freedom of Expression, en: Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 18 (1976), 347-377.
GARCÍA VILLEGAS, MAURICIO: La democracia constitucional: entre la libertad y la igualdad, en: Estudios Políticos 7-8, (1996), 121-146.
GARDNER, JAMES: Shut Up and Vote: A Critique of Deliberative Democracy and the Life of Talk, en: Tenn. L. Rev. 63 (1996), 421-451.
GAVIRIA, CARLOS: ¿Qué es el tercer estado?» de Siéyes, y el constitucionalismo colombiano, en: Estudios Políticos 1 (1992), 29-33.
GEY, STEVEN, The First Amendment and the Dissemination of Socially Worthless Untruths, en: Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 36 (2008), 1-22.
GREENAWALT, KENT: Speech, Crime, and the Uses of Language, Oxford University Press, Nueva York-Oxford, 1989.
GREENAWALT, KENT: Free Speech Justifications, en: Colum. L. Rev. 89 (1989), 119-155.
HART ELY, JOHN: Flag desecration: A case study in the roles of categorization and balancing in First Amendment and analysis, en: Harv. L. Rev. 88 (1974-1975), 1482-1508.
HELD, DAVID: Modelos de democracia, Alianza, Madrid, 1992.
HORWITZ, PAUL: The First Amendment's Epistemological Problem, en: Wash. L. Rev. 87 (2012), 445-493.
KAGAN, ELENA: Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine, en: U. Chi. L. Rev. 63 (1996), 413-517.
KALVEN, HARRY: The Reasonable Man and the First Amendment: Hill, Butts, and Walker, en: Sup. Ct. Rev. (1967), 267-310.
KANT, IMMANUEL: Respuesta a la pregunta “¿Qué es la ilustración?”, en: Erhard/Freiherr von Moser/Garve/Geich/Herder/Kant/Gotthold//Lessing/Riem/Schiller/Wieland/Zöllner/Hamann, ¿Qué es la Ilustración? 5.ª, Tecnos, Madrid, 2007, 17-25.
KLEHR, HARVEY/HAYNES, JOHN/FIRSIV, FRIDRIKH: The Secret World of American Communism, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1995.
KOPPELMAN, ANDREW: Veil of Ignorance: Tunnel Constructivism in Free Speech Theory, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 107 (2013), 647-730.
KYMLICKA, WILL: Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance, en Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1996, 81-105.
LAW, DAVID/VERSTEEG, MILA: Sham Constitutions, en: Calif. L. Rev. 101 (2013), 863-952.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Democracy and political theory (Trad. de: Macey, David), University of Minessota Press, Gran Bretaña, 1988.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Thinking with and against Hannah Arendt, en: Social Research 69 (2002), 447-459.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: El arte de escribir y lo político, Herder, Barcelona, 2007.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Maquiavelo. Lecturas de lo político, Trotta, Madrid, 2010.
LEFORT, CLAUDE: Democracia y representación, Prometeo, Buenos Aires, 2011.
MASSARO, TONI/NORTON, HELEN: Seriously? Free speech rights and artificial intelligence, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 110 (2016), 1169-1194.
MASSEY, CALVIN: Hate Speech, Cultural Diversity, and the Foundational Paradigms of Free Expression, en: UCLA L. Rev. 40 (1992), 103-197.
MILL, JOHN STUART: Sobre la libertad (Trad. de: de Azcárate y Flórez, Pablo), Alianza, Madrid, 2004.
MOUFFE, CHANTAL: El retorno de lo político: comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical, Paidós, Barcelona, 1999.
MURCHISON, BRIAN: Speech and the Truth-Seeking Value, en: Colum. J.L. & Arts 55 (2015), 55-117.
NAGEL, ROBERT: How Useful Is Judicial Review in Free Speech Cases, en: Cornell L. Rev. 69 (1984), 302-340.
NAGEL, THOMAS: Personal Rights and Public Space, en: Phil. Pub. Aff. 24 (1995), 83-107.
NICKEL, JAMES: Freedom of expression in a pluralistic society, en: Law & Phil 7 (1988-1989), 281-293.
NIMMER, MELVILLE: The Right to Speak from Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy, en: Cal. L. Rev. 56 (1968), 935- 967.
NINO, CARLOS SANTIAGO: Fundamentos de Derecho constitucional. Análisis filosófico, jurídico y politológico en la práctica judicial, Astrea, Buenos Aires, 1992.
OSBORNE, RAQUEL: ¿Son las mujeres una minoría?, en: Isegoría 14 (1996), 79-93.
OSHINSKY, DAVID: A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 1983.
PINKER, STEVEN: En defensa de la ilustración. Por la razón, la ciencia, el humanismo y el progreso (Trad. de: Hermida Lazcano, Pablo), Paidós, Barcelona, 2018.
POST, ROBERT: Meiklejohn's Mistake: Individual Autonomy and the Reform of Public Discourse, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 64 (1993), 1109-1137.
POST, ROBERT: Reconciling Theory and Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence en: Bollinger/Stone (eds.), Eternally Vigilant. Free speech in the modern era, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002, 120-151.
PRESNO LINERA, MIGUEL ÁNGEL/TERUEL LOZANO, GERMÁN: Libertad de expresión en América y Europa, Juruá Editora, Vila Nova de Gaia/Porto, 2017.
RABBAN, DAVID: The First Amendment in Its Forgotten Years, en: Yale L.J. 90 (1981), 514-595.
RABBAN, DAVID: The State Of Free Speech Doctrine In 1917, en: Ariz. St. L. J. 50 (2018), 911-918.
RAZ, JOSEPH: Free Expression and Personal Identification, en: Oxford J. Legal Stud. 11 (1991), 303-324.
REMUS IRWIN, DANA: Freedom of Thought: The First Amendment and the Scientific Method, en: Wis. L. Rev. (2005), 1479-1533.
RODRÍGUEZ MONTAÑÉS, MARÍA TERESA: Libertad de expresión, discurso extremo y delito una aproximación desde la Constitución a las fronteras del derecho penal, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2012.
ROGIN, MICHAEL: The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1967.
SARTORI, GIOVANI: Democracia en treinta lecciones (Trad. de: Pradera, Alejandro), Taurus, México, 2009.
SCANLON, THOMAS: A Theory of Freedom of expression, en: Phil. Pub. Aff. 1 (1972), 204-226.
SCANLON, THOMAS: The difficulty of Tolerance, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 2003.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Response: Pornography and the first amendment, en: U. Pitt. L. Rev. 40 (1979) 605-618.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Free speech: A Philosophical Enquiry, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York, 1982.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Must Speech Be Special?, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 78 (1983-1984), 1284-1306.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Role of the People in First Amendment Theory, en: Cal. L. Rev. 74 (1986), 761-788.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: Commercial Speech and the Architecture of the First Amendment, en: U. Cin. L. Rev. 56 (1988), 1181-1204.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Second-Best First Amendment, en: Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 31 (1989), 1-23.
SCHAUER, FREDERICK: The Sociology of the Hate Speech Debate, en: Vill. L. Rev. 37 (1992), 805-819.
SCHRECKER, ELLEN: The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents, St. Martin's Press, Boston, 1986.
SHIFFRIN, SEANA: A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech, en: Const. Comment. 27 (2011), 283-307.
SHIFFRIN, STEVEN: Dissent, Democratic Participation, and First Amendment Methodology, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 559-565.
SOLUM, LAWRENCE: Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech, en: Nw. U. L. Rev. 83 (1988-1989), 54-135.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Autonomy and Distrust, en: U. Colo. L. Rev. 64 (1993), 1171-1178.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Content-Neutral Restrictions, en: U. Chi. L. Rev. 54 (1987), 46-118.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: The Origins of the Bad Tendency Test: Free Speech in Wartime, en: Sup. Ct. Rev. (2002), 411-453.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Perilous Times: Free Speech in War Time From the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism, W.W. Norton & Company, Nueva York, 2004.
STONE, GEOFFREY R.: Free Speech in the Twenty-First Century: Ten Lessons from the Twentieth Century, en: Pepp. L. Rev. 36 (2008-2009), 273-299.
STONE, GEOFFREY R./SEIDMAN, LOUIS M./SUNSTEIN, CASS/TUSHNET, MARK/KARLAN, PAMELA S., The First Amendment, 2.ª, Aspen, Estados Unidos de América, 2003.
STROSSEN, NADINE: Hate Speech and Pornography: Do We Have to Choose between Freedom of Speech and Equality?, en: Cas. W. Res. L. Rev. 46 (1996), 449-478.
STRAUSS, DAVID: Persuasion, Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression, en: Colum. L. Rev. 91 (1991), 334-371.
SUNSTEIN, CASS: Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech, The Free Press, Nueva York, 1995.
SUNSTEIN, CASS: Designing democracy. What Constitutions Do, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
TARODO SORIA, SALVADOR: Estudio Preliminar: Hacia un Estudio Constitucional de la Libertad de Producción y Creación Artística y Literaria, en: Díaz y García Conlledo/García Amado/Junieles Acosta/Tarodo Soria, (coords.), Libertad de expresión y sentimientos religiosos, Juruá, Curitiba 2012, 17-34.
TAYLOR, CHARLES: The politics of recognition, en: Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism examining and the Politics of Recognition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994, 25-74.
TEN CATE, IRENE: Speech, Truth, and Freedom: An Examination of John Stuart Mill's and Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes's Free Speech Defenses, en: Yale J. L. & Human. 22 (2010), 35-81.
TODOROV, TZVETAN: A Passion for Democracy - Benjamin Constant, Algora, Estados Unidos de América, 1999.
TUSHNET, The Coverage/Protection Distinction in the Law of Freedom of Speech—An Essay on Meta-Doctrine in Constitutional, en: Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 25 (2017).
URBINATI, NADIA: Representative Democracy: Principies and genealogy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006.
URIBE BARRERA, JUAN PABLO: Bases para la interpretación y aplicación del derecho constitucional a la libertad de expresión, tesis doctoral inédita dirigida por: Díaz y García Conlledo, Universidad de León, 2019
VIVES ANTÓN, TOMÁS: La libertad como pretexto, Tirant lo Blanc, Valencia, 1995.
WEINSTEIN, JAMES: Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 491-514.
WEINSTEIN, JAMES: The Story of Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten: Judge Learned Hand, First Amendment Prophet en: Garnett/Koppelman (eds.), First Amendment Stories, 2011, 61-97.
WERHAN, KEITH: Freedom of speech: A reference guide of the United States Constitution, Praeger, Westport, 2004.
WILLIAMS, SUSAN: Democracy, Freedom of Speech, and Feminist Theory: A Response to Post and Weinstein, en: Va. L. Rev. 97 (2011), 603-616.
WILLIAMS, SUSAN: Content Discrimination and the First Amendment, en: U. Pa. L. Rev. 139 (1990-1991), 615-730.
Jurisprudencia
Corte Suprema y otras cortes de los Estados Unidos de América
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten 244 F 535 (S D NY 1917).
Abrams v. US 250 U.S. 616 (1919);
Frohwerk v. United States, U.S. 204 (1919), 249;
Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47 (1919), 52;
Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)
DeJonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353 (1937)
West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949)
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952)
Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109 (1959)
Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431 (1961)
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 23 (1971)
Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973)
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), 927 s.;
Herceg v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 814 F. 2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1987)
Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N. Y. State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105 (1991)
Ashcroft et. al. v. Free Speech Coalition et. al., 535 U.S. 234 (2002), 252
Corte Constitucional de Colombia
Sentencia T-104/1996, de 8 de marzo.
Sentencia T-213/2003, de 8 de marzo.
Sentencia T-391/2007, de 22 de mayo.
Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Caso Handyside v. United Kingdom, 7 de diciembre 1976.
Caso The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom, 29 de marzo 1979.
Caso Barthold v. Germany, 25 de marzo 1985.
Caso Lingens v. Austria, 8 de julio 1986.
Caso Müller y otros v. Switzerland, 24 de mayo 1988.
Caso Castells v. España, 23 de abril 1992.
Caso Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Islandia, 22 de junio de 1992.
Caso Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, 20 de 1994.
Caso Pavel Ivanov v. Rusia, 18 de diciembre de 1996.
Caso Lehideux y Isorni v. France, 23 de septiembre de 1998.
Caso Dichand y otros v. Austria, 26 de febrero de 2002.
Caso Perna v. Italy, 6 de mayo de 2003.
Caso Scharsach y News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, 13 de febrero de 2004.
Caso Giniewski v. Francia, 31 de abril de 2006.
Caso Soulas y otros v. Francia, 10 de octubre de 2008.
Caso Yurdatapan v. Turquia, 8 de enero de 2008.
Caso Otegi Mondragon v. España, 15 de marzo de 2011.
Caso Affaire Perinçek v. Suisse, 15 de octubre de 2015.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
Caso Ivcher Bronstein v. Brasil, 6 de febrero de 2001.
Caso de “La Última Tentación de Cristo” (Olmedo Bustos y otros) v. Chile, 5 de febrero de 2001.
Caso Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay, 31 de agosto de 2004.
Caso Herrera Ulloa v. Costa Rica, 2 de julio de 2004.
Caso Palamara Iribarne v. Chile, 22 de noviembre de 2005.
Caso Claude Reyes y otros v. Chile, 19 de septiembre de 2006.
Caso Perozo y otros v. Venezuela, 28 de enero de 2009.
Caso Ríos y otros v. Venezuela, 28 de enero de 2009.
Caso López Lone y otros v. Honduras,5 de octubre de 2015.
Caso Granier y otros (Radio Caracas Televisión) v. Venezuela, 22 de junio de 2015.
Caso Lagos del Campo v. Perú, 31 de agosto de 2017.
Otros tribunales
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina, Sentencia de 24 de junio de 2008, Patitó, José Ángel y otro v. Diario La Nación y otros.
Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, Sentencia de 30 de abril de 2009.
Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, de 2 de septiembre de 2010.
Tribunal Constitucional Plurinacional de Bolivia, Sentencia de 20 de septiembre 2012.
Sala Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Costa Rica, Sentencia de 29 de marzo de 2011.
Corte de Constitucionalidad de Guatemala, Sentencia de 1 de febrero de 2006.
Corte de Constitucionalidad de Guatemala, Sentencia de 14 de septiembre de 2010.
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación de México, Sentencia de 17 de junio de 2009.
Article Sidebar
Published
Jun 15, 2021
Article Details
How to Cite
Uribe Barrera, J. P., & Suarez López, B. E. (2021). Persuasion, freedom of expression and criminal law. Nuevo Foro Penal, 17(96). https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp17.96.3
Section
Studies
Supporting Agencies
la Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).