Between Protest and Terrorism: A Dogmatic and Procedural Critique of Supreme Court Decision SP022-2025
Main Article Content
Keywords
Decision SP022-2025, Colombian Supreme Court, protest, terrorism
Downloads
References
Colombia. Congreso de la República. Código Penal. Ley 599 de 2000. Julio 24 de 2000.
Colombia. Congreso de la República. Código de Procedimiento Penal. Ley 906 de 2004. Agosto 31 de 2004.
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Sentencia SP14191-2016 del 5 de octubre de 2016. Rad.45594 (M.P. José Francisco Acuña Vizcaya).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Sentencia SP2442-2021 de 16 de junio de 2021. Rad.53183 (M.P. Patricia Salazar Cuéllar).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Sentencia SP022-2025 del 22 de enero de 2025. Rad.60580 (M.P. Fernando León Bolaños Palacios).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Salvamento parcial de voto en la Sentencia SP022- 2025 (Magistrada Myriam Ávila Roldan).
Fakhouri Gómez, Yamila. ¿Qué es el terrorismo? Un intento de ponerle sábana al fantasma. Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes, 2014.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).