Social Mobilization and Deliberation The Collective Action Frame as the Conclusion of a Deliberative Dialogue
Main Article Content
Keywords
Collective action, collective action frame, practical reasoning, social movement, social movement organization, deliberative dialogue
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explain the collective action of social movement organizations by means of framing processes that are understood as the result of a deliberative dialogue. To this end, the text is divided into four sections. The first section introduces the framing theory of social movement studies; the second section examines different explanations concerning the creation of a collective action framework. The third section considers the characterization of Walton and Krabbe’s deliberative dialogue (2017) as well as Fairclough and Fairclough’s practical reasoning scheme (2012) for the purpose of tracing a relationship between collective action framing and such dialogues. The last section concludes that the collective action of activists involved in the framing processes can be understood as a deliberate collective action.
Downloads
References
Barisione, M. (2012). Framing a Deliberation: Deliberative Democracy and the Challenge of Framing Processes. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1), Art. 2. https://bit.ly/2QiJZpN
Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39-51. https://bit.ly/2xHd5sH
Benford, R. D. (1993). Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Social Forces, 71(3), 677-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/71.3.677
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Black, L. W. (2013). Framing Democracy and Conflict Through Storytelling in Deliberative Groups. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), Art. 4. https://bit.ly/3d6zU9x
Bodtker, A. M. & Jameson, J. K. (1997). Mediation as Mutual Influence: Reexamining the Use of Framing and Reframing. Mediation Quarterly, 14(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900140307
Diani, M. (1995). Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement. Edinburgh University Press.
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.
Gamson, W. A. & Lasch K. E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. En S. E. Spiro, & E. Yuchtman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives (pp. 397-415). Academic Press.
Goffman E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of the Experience. Harper Colophon.
Gómez, J. A. (2019). Diálogos deliberativos como explicación de acciones colectivas. Artículo no publicado.
Harré, R. (2006). El frame analysis de Goffman. En E. Goffman, Frame análisis: Los marcos de la experiencia (pp. XIII-XVI). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Siglo XXI.
Hunt, S. A., Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (1994). Identity Fields: Framing Processes and the Social Construction of Movement Identities. En E. Laraña, H. Johnston, & J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New Social Movements: From ideology to Identity (pp. 185-208). Temple University Press.
Macagno, F. & Walton, D. N. (2018). Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach. Argumentation, 32, 519-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5
McLean, P. D. (1998). Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks, and Political Culture. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 51-91. https://doi.org/10.1086/210002
Morris, A. D. & Staggenborg, S. (2004). Leadership in Social Movements. En D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 171-196). Blackwell Pub.
Noakes, J, A. & Johnston, H. (2005). Frames of Protest: A Road Map to a Perspective. En J, A. Noakes, & H. Johnston (Eds.), Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective (pp. 1-32). Rowman & Littlefield.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
Sciubba, J. D. (2014). Framing and Power in Aging Advocacy. Social Movement Studies, 13(4), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.860026
Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-218. https://bit.ly/3aWvoIx
Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. En A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133-155). Yale University Press.
Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. https://bit.ly/38Tqgnh
Tilly, C. y Wood, L. J. (2009). Los movimientos sociales, 1768-2008: Desde sus orígenes a Facebook. Crítica.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Evaluating Practical Reasoning. Synthese, 157(2), 197-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9157-x
Walton, D. N. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2017 [1995]). Argumentación y normatividad dialógica: Compromisos y razonamiento interpersonal (C. Santibáñez, Trad.). Palestra.
Willems, J. & Jegers, M. (2012). Social Movement Structures in Relation to Goals and Forms of Action: An exploratory model. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 3(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2012v3n2a128
Williams, R. H. (2004). The Cultural Contexts of Collective Action: Constraints, Opportunities, and the Symbolic Life of Social Movements. En D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 91-115). Blackwell Pub.
Wittgenstein, L. (2008 [1953]). Investigaciones filosóficas. Crítica.
Yangzom, D. (2016). Clothing and social movements: Tibet and the politics of dress. Social Movement Studies, 15(6), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1213163
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Daniel Mejía Saldarriaga, Universidad EAFIT
Joven investigador Colciencias. Magíster en Estudios Humanísticos de la Universidad EAFIT
María Rocío Arango, Universidad EAFIT
Magíster en Administración de la Universidad de Los Andes. Profesora asociada al Departamento de Humanidades de la Universidad EAFIT.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Avisos:
- No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material de dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable .
- No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le otorgue todos los permisos necesarios para el uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
