A good example of how not to use ChatGPT in the administration of justice. Commentary to the Judgment of the Criminal Chamber of the Superior Tribunal of Pereira of April 3, 2024 (76 001 60 00193 2013 80734 01)

Authors

  • Juan Camilo Boada Acosta Investigador independiente
  • María Lucía Márquez Independent researcher

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Chat GPT, Justice administration

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 103 (2024): Nuevo Foro Penal

Section

Jurisprudence

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Boada Acosta, J. C., & Márquez, M. L. (2024). A good example of how not to use ChatGPT in the administration of justice. Commentary to the Judgment of the Criminal Chamber of the Superior Tribunal of Pereira of April 3, 2024 (76 001 60 00193 2013 80734 01). Nuevo Foro Penal, 20(103). https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/nuevo-foro-penal/article/view/8213

Most read articles by the same author(s)