Cognitive foundations of harmonic functionality

Main Article Content

David Ricardo Quiroga Martínez https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-6395

Keywords

tonal harmony, musical expectations, harmonic functions, levels of functionality, experimental psychology, cognitive psychology, schemes

Abstract

This exploratory study addresses the problem of the levels of harmonic functionality in the tonal system. Specifically, we attempt to define whether it is appropriate to propose a model in which several chords can play the role of tonic, dominant or subdominant, grouped hierarchically in four levels as suggested by Yepes (2011). In order to approach this objective, we used  experimental psychology methods, seeking to establish whether listeners perceive different levels of functionality and if musical training affects this perception. Thus, we obtained numerical valuations from various subjects who evaluated how expected or unexpected was the last chord of a cadence. There were five different types of resolution: I, vi, iii and IV6, corresponding to the levels of the tonic function, and bII6, corresponding to a Neapolitan chord misused which served as a control condition. The results suggest that listeners can differentiate and perceive hierarchically the four levels of functionality proposed and that musical training enhances the ability to discriminate between levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 730 | PDF (Español) Downloads 1642

References

Bharucha, J. y Krumhansl, C. L. (1983). The representation of harmonic structure in music: hierarchies of stability as a function of context. Cognition, 13, 63–102.

Forte, A. y Gilbert, S. (2003). Análisis musical: introducción al análisis schenkeriano. Idea Books.

Huron, D. y Margulis, E. (2010). Musical expectancy and thrills. En: J. a Sloboda y J. Patrick (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Music and Emotion (pp. 575–604). Oxford University Press.

Justus, T. y Bharucha, J. (2002). Music perception and cognition. En: S. Yantis y H. Pashler (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Volume 1: Sensation and Perception (Tercera Edición., Vol. 1, pp. 453–492). New York, Wiley.

Koelsch, S. (2012). Brain and Music (p. 322). Wiley- Blackwell.

Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press.

Krumhansl, C. L. y Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological review, 89(4), 334–68.

Lerdahl, F. y Krumhansl, C. L. (2007). Modeling tonal tension. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 329–366.

Lerdahl, F. y Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.

Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Journal of Music Theory (Vol. 1, p. 307). University of Chicago Press.

Snyder, B. (2000). Music and Memory (p. 291). MIT Press.

Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S. y Sloboda, J. a. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 18(8), 1380–93.

Yepes, G. (2011). Cuatro teoremas sobre la música tonal. Cuadernos de Investigación. Medellín, Colombia: Dirección de Investigación y Docencia, Universidad EAFIT.