La Evolución de los Estudios de Redes de Directores – Una Perspectiva de Tendencia Global
Main Article Content
Keywords
Redes de directorios, gobierno corporativo, red corporativa, élite de negocios
Resumen
Las redes de directores han sido objeto de muchos estudios que exploran sus consecuencias tales como la colaboración de recursos, transmisión de prácticas, decisiones financieras, reducción de la incertidumbre, control, reputación e intereses individuales. Sin embargo, aún no existe un consenso acerca de lo que estas redes de directorios realmente hacen para las empresas y el camino que sigue su investigación. Este estudio realizó una revisión extensa de 75 artículos (desde 1969 hasta 2018) enfocados en estas redes y propone dos categorías y cuatro subcategorías de acuerdo a sus resultados para las empresas. Se encontró que la mayor contribución para las empresas se enfoca en la descripción de la estructura de la red y en los resultados de control, mostrando diferencia entre la investigación de Norteamérica y otras regiones, dando luz acerca de lo que hacen estas redes para las empresas. Se identificó también que los efectos de difusión, la globalización y la colusión requieren más atención.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Referencias
Adler, P. and Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. doi: 10.2307/4134367
Beckman, C., Haunschild, P. and Phillips, D. (2004). Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259-275. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0065
Bennett, R. (2013). Network interlocks: The connected emergence of chambers of commerce and provincial banks in the British Isles, 1767-1823. Business History, 55(8), 1288-1317. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2012.725163
Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419-430. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250110602
Breiger, R. (1974). The Duality of Persons and Groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181-190. doi: 10.2307/2576011
Bucheli, M., Salvaj, E. and Kim, M. (2018). Better together: How multinationals come together with business groups in times of economic and political transitions. Global Strategy Journal, 1-32. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1326
Buchnea, E., Tilba, A. and Wilson, J. (2018). British corporate networks, 1976-2010: Extending the study of finance-industry relationships. Business History, 1-31. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1512096
Buch-Hansen, H. (2014). Interlocking directorates and collusion: An empirical analysis. International Sociology, 29(3), 249-267. doi: 10.1177/0268580914527021
Buck, A. (2018). The Corporate Networks and Symbolic Capital of British Business Leaders. Sociological Perspectives, 1-20. doi: 10.1177/0731121417753368
Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion among Corporate Elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249-283. doi: 10.1086/428817
Burt, R. (1980). Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 557-582. doi: 10.2307/2392281
Cai, Y., Dhaliwal, D. S., Kim, Y. and Pan, C. (2014). Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 19, 1086-1119. doi: 10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0
Cai, Y. and Sevilir, M. (2012). Board Connections and M&A Transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 327-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017
Cárdenas, J. (2015). Are Latin America’s corporate elites transnationally interconnected? A network analysis of interlocking directorates. Global Networks, 15(4), 424-445. doi: 10.1111/glob.12070
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Cárdenas, J. (2016). Enredando a las Elites Empresariales en América Latina: Análisis de Redes de Interlocking Directorates y Propiedad en México, Chile, Perú y Brasil. América Latina Hoy, 73, 15-44. doi: 10.14201/alh2016731544
Carroll, W. (2002). Does Disorganized Capitalism Disorganize Corporate Networks? The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 339-371. doi: 10.2307/3341548
Chiu, P., Hong Teoh, S. and Tian, F. (2013). Board Interlocks and Earnings Management Contagion. American Accounting Association, 88(3), 915-944. doi: 10.2308/accr-50369CNN. (2015, October 15th). CNNMoney: 7 de los más grandes escándalos corporativos. CNN. Retrieved from https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2015/10/15/7-de-los-mas-grandes-escandalos-corporativos/
Conyon, M. and Muldoon, M. (2006). The Small World of Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9) & (10), 1321-1343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00634.x
Davis, G. (1991). Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. doi: 10.2307/2393275
Davis, G. and Greve, H. (1997). Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37. doi: 10.1086/231170
Davis, G. and Mizruchi, M. (1999). The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 215-239. doi: 10.2307/2666995
Davis, G., Yoo, M. and Baker, W. (2003). The Small World of the American Corporate Elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301-326. doi: 10.1177/14761270030013002
David, T. and Westerhuis, G. (2014). Comparing Corporate Networks in a Long-Term Perspective. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 1-28). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dooley, P. (1969). The Interlocking Directorate. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314-323. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808960
Fracassi, C. (2016). Corporate Finance Policies and Social Networks. Management Science, 21, 1-19. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2433
Fracassi, C. and Tate, G. (2012). External Networking and Internal Firm Governance. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 153-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01706.x
Geletkanycz, M., Boyd, B. and Finkelstein, S. (2001). The Strategic Value of CEO External Directorate Networks: Implications for CEO Compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 889-898. doi: 10.1002/smj.172
Ginalski, S., David, T. and Mach, A. (2014). From National Cohesion to Transnationalization: The Changing Role of Banks in the Swiss Company Networks, 1910-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 107-124). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ginesti, G., Sannino, G. and Drago, C. (2017). Board connections and management commentary readability: the role of information sharing in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(1), 30-47. doi: 10.1108/CG-01-2016-0015
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M (1976). Network Sampling: Some First Steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1287-1303. doi: 10.1086/226224
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. doi: 10.1086/228311
Haunschild, P. and Beckman, C. (1998). When Do Interlocks Matter? Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 815-844. doi: 10.2307/2393617
Hitt, M., Ireland, R., Camp, S. and Sexton, D. (2001). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-491. doi: 10.1002/smj.196
Jäger, U. and Sathe, V. (2014). Sustainability for strategy. In Jäger, U. (Ed.) & Sathe, V. (Ed.), Strategy and Competitiveness in Latin American Markets. The Sustainability Frontier (1st ed., pp. 3-17). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Johansen, T. R. and Pettersson, K. (2013). The Impact of Board Interlocks on Auditor Choice and Audit Fees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(3), 287-310. doi: 10.1111/corg.12013
Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J. (2006). Interorganizational Ties and Business Group Boundaries: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Organization Science, 17(3), 333-352. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0188
Khanna, T. and Thomas, C. (2009). Synchronicity and firm interlocks in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 182-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.005
Kogut, B. (2012). The Small World of Corporate Governance: An Introduction. In Kogut, B. (Ed.), The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance (1st ed., pp. 1-52). United States of America: MIT Press.
Kogut, B. and Walker, G. (2001). The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 317-335. doi: 10.2307/3088882
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Kwon, S. and Adler, P. (2014). Social Capital: Maturation of a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 412-422. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0210
Larcker, D., So, E. and Wang, C. (2013). Boardroom Centrality and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55, 225-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006
Lluch, A., Rinaldi, A., Salvaj, E. and Vasta, M. (2017). Directors and syndics in corporate networks: Argentina and Italy compared (1913-1990). Business History, 1-26. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1382474
Lluch, A., Salvaj, E. and Barbero, M. (2014). Corporate Networks and Business Groups in Argentina in the Early 1970s. Australian Economic History Review, 54(2), 183-207. doi: 10.1111/aehr.12044
Mariolis, P. and Jones, M. H. (1982). Centrality in Corporate Interlock Networks: Reliability and Stability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 571-585. Doi: 10.2307/2392531
Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R. and Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and Firm Performance: The Role of Uncertainty in the Directorate Interlock-Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 235-253. doi: 10.1002/smj.2216
Mazzola, E., Perrone, G. and Kamuriwo, D. S. (2016). The interaction between inter-firm and interlocking directorate networks on firm’s new product development outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 672-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.033
Mizruchi, M. (1996). What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assesment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271
Mizruchi, M. and Brewster Stearns, L. (1988). A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194-210. doi: 10.2307/2393055
Mizruchi, M. and Brewster Stearns, L. (1994). A Longitudinal Study of Borrowing by Large American Corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 118-140. doi: 10.2307/2393496
Mizruchi, M., Brewster Stearns, L. and Marquis, C. (2006). The Conditional Nature of Embeddedness: A Study of Borrowing by Large U.S. Firms, 1973-1994. American Sociological Review, 71(April), 310-333. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100207
Mizruchi, M. and Bunting, D. (1981). Influence in Corporate Networks: An Examination of Four Measures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 475-489. doi: 10.2307/2392519
Mizruchi, M. and Koenig, T. (1991). Size, Concentration, and Corporate Networks: Determinants of Business Collective Action. Social Science Quarterly, 72(2), 299-313. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42864260
Moore, G., Sobieraj, S., Allen Whitt, J., Mayorova, O. and Beaulieu, D. (2002). Elite Interlocks in Three U.S. Sectors: Nonprofit, Corporate, and Government. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 726-744. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00111
Musacchio, A. and Read, I. (2007). Bankers, Industrialists, and their Cliques: Elite Networks in Mexico and Brazil during Early Industrialization. Oxford University Press, 842-880. doi: 10.1017/S1467222700006479
Naudet, J. and Dubost, C. (2017). The Indian exception: the densification of the network of corporate interlocks and the specificities of the Indian business system (2000-2012). Socio-Economic Review, 15(2), 405-434. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwv035
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Delgado-Ceballos, J. and Ferrón-Vílchez, V. (2012). The Effect of Director Interlocks on Firms’ Adoption of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00893.x
Palmer, D. (1983). Broken Ties: Interlocking Directorates and Intercorporate Coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 40-55. doi: 10.2307/2392384
Palmer, D., Friedland, R. and Singh, J. V. (1986). The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 781-796. doi: 10.2307/2095367
Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S. and Ralston, D.A. (2006). New Frontiers in Network Theory Development. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 560-568. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318917
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228. doi: 10.2307/2393956
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective(1st ed.). United States of America: Stanford University Press.
Phan, P., Hoon Lee, S. and Chi Lau, S. (2003). The Performance Impact of Interlocking Directorates: The Case of Singapore. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(3), 338-352. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604436
Pombo, C. and Gutiérrez, L. H. (2011). Outside directors, board interlocks and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Colombian business groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63, 251-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.01.002
Richardson, R. J. (1987). Directorship Interlocks and Corporate Profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 367-386. doi: 10.2307/2392910
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Salvaj, E. (2013). Cohesión y Homogeneidad. Evolución de la red de directorios de las grandes empresas en Chile, 1969-2005. In Ossandón, J. (Ed.) & Tironi, E. (Ed.), Adaptación: la empresa chilena después de Friedman (1st ed., pp. 55-84). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
Salvaj, E. and Couyoumdjian, J. P. (2015). ‘Interlocked’ business groups and the state in Chile (1970-2010). Business History, 58(1), 129-148. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2015.1044517
Salvaj, E. and Ferraro, F. (2005). Las Redes de Propiedad y de Consejos de Administración del IBEX 35. In Ricart, J. (Ed.), Álvarez, J. L. (Ed.) & Gifra, J. (Ed.), Los accionistas y el gobierno de la empresa. Análisis de la situación española (1st ed., pp. 179-211). Barcelona, España: Deusto.
Salvaj, E., Ferraro, F. and Tapies, J. (2008). Family Firms and the Contingent Value of Board Interlocks: The Spanish Case. In Tapies, J. (Ed.) & Ward, J. L. (Ed.), Family Values and Value Creation. A Family Business Publication. (1st ed., pp. 236-259). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Salvaj, E. and Lluch, A. (2014). Longitudinal Study of Interlocking Directorates in Argentina and Foreign Firms’ Integration into Local Capitalism (1923-2000). In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 257-275). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schneider, B. (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Business, Labor, and the Challenges for Equitable Development (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schnyder, G. and Wilson, J. F. (2014). The Structure of Networks: The Transformation of UK Business, 1904-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.
Shipilov, A., Greve, H. and Rowley, T. (2010). When de Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846-864. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.52814614
Shropshire, C. (2010). The Role of the Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in the Diffusion of Practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246-264. doi: 10.5465/amr.35.2.zok246
Silva, F., Majluf, N. and Paredes, R. (2006). Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(2006), 315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.09.004
Simmons, C. (2011). Converging Competitors? Board Interlocks in the Changing Media Landscape. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 201-213. doi: 10.1080/08997764.2011.601981
Stuart, T. and Yim, S. (2010). Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 97, 174-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.012
Szalacha, J. (2011). Interlocking Directorates and Possible Conflict of Interests. Polish Sociological Review, 174, 205-216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41275200
Takes, F. and Heemskerk, E. (2016). Centrality in the global network of corporate control. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(97), 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0402-5
Travers, J. and Milgram, S. (1969). An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425-443. doi: 10.2307/2786545
Useem, M. (1980). Corporations and the Corporate Elite. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 41-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000353
Useem, M. (1984). The Inner Circle. Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (1st ed.). United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Vassolo, R., De Castro, J. and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2011). Managing in Latin America. Common Issues and a Research Agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, (November), 22-34. doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0129
Westerhuis, G. (2014). The Dutch Corporate Network: Considering its Persistance. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 89-106). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wilson, J., Buchnea, E. and Tilba, A. (2017). The British corporate network, 1904-1976: Revisiting the finance-industry relationship. Business History, 60(6), 779-806. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1333106
Windolf, P. (2009). Coordination and Control in Corporate Networks: United States and Germany in Comparison, 1896-1939. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 443-457. doi: 1093/esr/jcn059
Windolf, P. and Beyer, J. (1996). Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 205-231. doi: 10.2307/591724
Zajac, E. (1988). Interlocking Directorates as an Interorganizational Strategy: A Test of Critical Assumptions. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 428-438. doi: 10.2307/256558
Zajac, E. and Westphal, J. (1996). Director Reputation, CEO-Board Power, and the Dynamics of Board Interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507-529. doi: 10.2307/2393940
Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and Withers, M. C. (2018). Board Interlocks and Firm Performance: Toward a Combined Agency-Resource Dependence Perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 589-618. doi: 10.1177/0149206315579512
Beckman, C., Haunschild, P. and Phillips, D. (2004). Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259-275. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0065
Bennett, R. (2013). Network interlocks: The connected emergence of chambers of commerce and provincial banks in the British Isles, 1767-1823. Business History, 55(8), 1288-1317. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2012.725163
Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419-430. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250110602
Breiger, R. (1974). The Duality of Persons and Groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181-190. doi: 10.2307/2576011
Bucheli, M., Salvaj, E. and Kim, M. (2018). Better together: How multinationals come together with business groups in times of economic and political transitions. Global Strategy Journal, 1-32. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1326
Buchnea, E., Tilba, A. and Wilson, J. (2018). British corporate networks, 1976-2010: Extending the study of finance-industry relationships. Business History, 1-31. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1512096
Buch-Hansen, H. (2014). Interlocking directorates and collusion: An empirical analysis. International Sociology, 29(3), 249-267. doi: 10.1177/0268580914527021
Buck, A. (2018). The Corporate Networks and Symbolic Capital of British Business Leaders. Sociological Perspectives, 1-20. doi: 10.1177/0731121417753368
Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion among Corporate Elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249-283. doi: 10.1086/428817
Burt, R. (1980). Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 557-582. doi: 10.2307/2392281
Cai, Y., Dhaliwal, D. S., Kim, Y. and Pan, C. (2014). Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 19, 1086-1119. doi: 10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0
Cai, Y. and Sevilir, M. (2012). Board Connections and M&A Transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 327-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017
Cárdenas, J. (2015). Are Latin America’s corporate elites transnationally interconnected? A network analysis of interlocking directorates. Global Networks, 15(4), 424-445. doi: 10.1111/glob.12070
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Cárdenas, J. (2016). Enredando a las Elites Empresariales en América Latina: Análisis de Redes de Interlocking Directorates y Propiedad en México, Chile, Perú y Brasil. América Latina Hoy, 73, 15-44. doi: 10.14201/alh2016731544
Carroll, W. (2002). Does Disorganized Capitalism Disorganize Corporate Networks? The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 339-371. doi: 10.2307/3341548
Chiu, P., Hong Teoh, S. and Tian, F. (2013). Board Interlocks and Earnings Management Contagion. American Accounting Association, 88(3), 915-944. doi: 10.2308/accr-50369CNN. (2015, October 15th). CNNMoney: 7 de los más grandes escándalos corporativos. CNN. Retrieved from https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2015/10/15/7-de-los-mas-grandes-escandalos-corporativos/
Conyon, M. and Muldoon, M. (2006). The Small World of Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9) & (10), 1321-1343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00634.x
Davis, G. (1991). Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. doi: 10.2307/2393275
Davis, G. and Greve, H. (1997). Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37. doi: 10.1086/231170
Davis, G. and Mizruchi, M. (1999). The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 215-239. doi: 10.2307/2666995
Davis, G., Yoo, M. and Baker, W. (2003). The Small World of the American Corporate Elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301-326. doi: 10.1177/14761270030013002
David, T. and Westerhuis, G. (2014). Comparing Corporate Networks in a Long-Term Perspective. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 1-28). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dooley, P. (1969). The Interlocking Directorate. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314-323. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808960
Fracassi, C. (2016). Corporate Finance Policies and Social Networks. Management Science, 21, 1-19. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2433
Fracassi, C. and Tate, G. (2012). External Networking and Internal Firm Governance. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 153-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01706.x
Geletkanycz, M., Boyd, B. and Finkelstein, S. (2001). The Strategic Value of CEO External Directorate Networks: Implications for CEO Compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 889-898. doi: 10.1002/smj.172
Ginalski, S., David, T. and Mach, A. (2014). From National Cohesion to Transnationalization: The Changing Role of Banks in the Swiss Company Networks, 1910-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 107-124). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ginesti, G., Sannino, G. and Drago, C. (2017). Board connections and management commentary readability: the role of information sharing in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(1), 30-47. doi: 10.1108/CG-01-2016-0015
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M (1976). Network Sampling: Some First Steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1287-1303. doi: 10.1086/226224
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. doi: 10.1086/228311
Haunschild, P. and Beckman, C. (1998). When Do Interlocks Matter? Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 815-844. doi: 10.2307/2393617
Hitt, M., Ireland, R., Camp, S. and Sexton, D. (2001). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-491. doi: 10.1002/smj.196
Jäger, U. and Sathe, V. (2014). Sustainability for strategy. In Jäger, U. (Ed.) & Sathe, V. (Ed.), Strategy and Competitiveness in Latin American Markets. The Sustainability Frontier (1st ed., pp. 3-17). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Johansen, T. R. and Pettersson, K. (2013). The Impact of Board Interlocks on Auditor Choice and Audit Fees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(3), 287-310. doi: 10.1111/corg.12013
Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J. (2006). Interorganizational Ties and Business Group Boundaries: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Organization Science, 17(3), 333-352. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0188
Khanna, T. and Thomas, C. (2009). Synchronicity and firm interlocks in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 182-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.03.005
Kogut, B. (2012). The Small World of Corporate Governance: An Introduction. In Kogut, B. (Ed.), The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance (1st ed., pp. 1-52). United States of America: MIT Press.
Kogut, B. and Walker, G. (2001). The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 317-335. doi: 10.2307/3088882
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Kwon, S. and Adler, P. (2014). Social Capital: Maturation of a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 412-422. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0210
Larcker, D., So, E. and Wang, C. (2013). Boardroom Centrality and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55, 225-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006
Lluch, A., Rinaldi, A., Salvaj, E. and Vasta, M. (2017). Directors and syndics in corporate networks: Argentina and Italy compared (1913-1990). Business History, 1-26. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1382474
Lluch, A., Salvaj, E. and Barbero, M. (2014). Corporate Networks and Business Groups in Argentina in the Early 1970s. Australian Economic History Review, 54(2), 183-207. doi: 10.1111/aehr.12044
Mariolis, P. and Jones, M. H. (1982). Centrality in Corporate Interlock Networks: Reliability and Stability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 571-585. Doi: 10.2307/2392531
Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R. and Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and Firm Performance: The Role of Uncertainty in the Directorate Interlock-Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 235-253. doi: 10.1002/smj.2216
Mazzola, E., Perrone, G. and Kamuriwo, D. S. (2016). The interaction between inter-firm and interlocking directorate networks on firm’s new product development outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 672-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.033
Mizruchi, M. (1996). What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assesment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271
Mizruchi, M. and Brewster Stearns, L. (1988). A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194-210. doi: 10.2307/2393055
Mizruchi, M. and Brewster Stearns, L. (1994). A Longitudinal Study of Borrowing by Large American Corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 118-140. doi: 10.2307/2393496
Mizruchi, M., Brewster Stearns, L. and Marquis, C. (2006). The Conditional Nature of Embeddedness: A Study of Borrowing by Large U.S. Firms, 1973-1994. American Sociological Review, 71(April), 310-333. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100207
Mizruchi, M. and Bunting, D. (1981). Influence in Corporate Networks: An Examination of Four Measures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 475-489. doi: 10.2307/2392519
Mizruchi, M. and Koenig, T. (1991). Size, Concentration, and Corporate Networks: Determinants of Business Collective Action. Social Science Quarterly, 72(2), 299-313. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42864260
Moore, G., Sobieraj, S., Allen Whitt, J., Mayorova, O. and Beaulieu, D. (2002). Elite Interlocks in Three U.S. Sectors: Nonprofit, Corporate, and Government. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 726-744. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00111
Musacchio, A. and Read, I. (2007). Bankers, Industrialists, and their Cliques: Elite Networks in Mexico and Brazil during Early Industrialization. Oxford University Press, 842-880. doi: 10.1017/S1467222700006479
Naudet, J. and Dubost, C. (2017). The Indian exception: the densification of the network of corporate interlocks and the specificities of the Indian business system (2000-2012). Socio-Economic Review, 15(2), 405-434. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwv035
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Delgado-Ceballos, J. and Ferrón-Vílchez, V. (2012). The Effect of Director Interlocks on Firms’ Adoption of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00893.x
Palmer, D. (1983). Broken Ties: Interlocking Directorates and Intercorporate Coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 40-55. doi: 10.2307/2392384
Palmer, D., Friedland, R. and Singh, J. V. (1986). The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 781-796. doi: 10.2307/2095367
Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S. and Ralston, D.A. (2006). New Frontiers in Network Theory Development. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 560-568. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318917
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228. doi: 10.2307/2393956
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective(1st ed.). United States of America: Stanford University Press.
Phan, P., Hoon Lee, S. and Chi Lau, S. (2003). The Performance Impact of Interlocking Directorates: The Case of Singapore. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(3), 338-352. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604436
Pombo, C. and Gutiérrez, L. H. (2011). Outside directors, board interlocks and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Colombian business groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63, 251-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.01.002
Richardson, R. J. (1987). Directorship Interlocks and Corporate Profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 367-386. doi: 10.2307/2392910
Miguel Ignacio Córdova EspinozaThe Evolution of Interlocking Directorates Studies - A Global Trend Perspective
Salvaj, E. (2013). Cohesión y Homogeneidad. Evolución de la red de directorios de las grandes empresas en Chile, 1969-2005. In Ossandón, J. (Ed.) & Tironi, E. (Ed.), Adaptación: la empresa chilena después de Friedman (1st ed., pp. 55-84). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
Salvaj, E. and Couyoumdjian, J. P. (2015). ‘Interlocked’ business groups and the state in Chile (1970-2010). Business History, 58(1), 129-148. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2015.1044517
Salvaj, E. and Ferraro, F. (2005). Las Redes de Propiedad y de Consejos de Administración del IBEX 35. In Ricart, J. (Ed.), Álvarez, J. L. (Ed.) & Gifra, J. (Ed.), Los accionistas y el gobierno de la empresa. Análisis de la situación española (1st ed., pp. 179-211). Barcelona, España: Deusto.
Salvaj, E., Ferraro, F. and Tapies, J. (2008). Family Firms and the Contingent Value of Board Interlocks: The Spanish Case. In Tapies, J. (Ed.) & Ward, J. L. (Ed.), Family Values and Value Creation. A Family Business Publication. (1st ed., pp. 236-259). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Salvaj, E. and Lluch, A. (2014). Longitudinal Study of Interlocking Directorates in Argentina and Foreign Firms’ Integration into Local Capitalism (1923-2000). In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 257-275). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schneider, B. (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Business, Labor, and the Challenges for Equitable Development (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schnyder, G. and Wilson, J. F. (2014). The Structure of Networks: The Transformation of UK Business, 1904-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.
Shipilov, A., Greve, H. and Rowley, T. (2010). When de Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846-864. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.52814614
Shropshire, C. (2010). The Role of the Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in the Diffusion of Practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246-264. doi: 10.5465/amr.35.2.zok246
Silva, F., Majluf, N. and Paredes, R. (2006). Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(2006), 315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.09.004
Simmons, C. (2011). Converging Competitors? Board Interlocks in the Changing Media Landscape. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 201-213. doi: 10.1080/08997764.2011.601981
Stuart, T. and Yim, S. (2010). Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 97, 174-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.012
Szalacha, J. (2011). Interlocking Directorates and Possible Conflict of Interests. Polish Sociological Review, 174, 205-216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41275200
Takes, F. and Heemskerk, E. (2016). Centrality in the global network of corporate control. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(97), 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0402-5
Travers, J. and Milgram, S. (1969). An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425-443. doi: 10.2307/2786545
Useem, M. (1980). Corporations and the Corporate Elite. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 41-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000353
Useem, M. (1984). The Inner Circle. Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (1st ed.). United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Vassolo, R., De Castro, J. and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2011). Managing in Latin America. Common Issues and a Research Agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, (November), 22-34. doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0129
Westerhuis, G. (2014). The Dutch Corporate Network: Considering its Persistance. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 89-106). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wilson, J., Buchnea, E. and Tilba, A. (2017). The British corporate network, 1904-1976: Revisiting the finance-industry relationship. Business History, 60(6), 779-806. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2017.1333106
Windolf, P. (2009). Coordination and Control in Corporate Networks: United States and Germany in Comparison, 1896-1939. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 443-457. doi: 1093/esr/jcn059
Windolf, P. and Beyer, J. (1996). Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 205-231. doi: 10.2307/591724
Zajac, E. (1988). Interlocking Directorates as an Interorganizational Strategy: A Test of Critical Assumptions. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 428-438. doi: 10.2307/256558
Zajac, E. and Westphal, J. (1996). Director Reputation, CEO-Board Power, and the Dynamics of Board Interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507-529. doi: 10.2307/2393940
Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and Withers, M. C. (2018). Board Interlocks and Firm Performance: Toward a Combined Agency-Resource Dependence Perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 589-618. doi: 10.1177/0149206315579512
Article Sidebar
Publicado
dic 12, 2018
Article Details
Cómo citar
Córdova, M. I. (2018). La Evolución de los Estudios de Redes de Directores – Una Perspectiva de Tendencia Global. AD-Minister, (33), 135–165. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.33.7
Número
Sección
Artículos de investigación
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
a. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
b. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
c. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).