Impacto de factores interorganizacionales y extraorganizacionales en las políticas de Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos en economías emergentes

Main Article Content

Iman Esmaeelzadeh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-4562
Mahboobeh Karimi Tararani https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-6646
Amin Tayebi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-138X
Farinaz Kordbacheh Roudhend https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-0329

Keywords

Política de parques C&T, Factores intraorganizacionales, Factores extraorganizacionales

Resumen

Este artículo tiene como objetivo estudiar la formulación de políticas resultante del impacto de factores intra y extraorganizacionales de los parques científicos y tecnológicos (parques C&T). Este artículo se clasifica como aplicado, en términos de objetivo, y cuantitativo, en términos de recopilación de datos. La población está compuesta por altos directivos de empresas establecidas en los cinco parques C&T seleccionados, alcanzando un total de 493. Aplicando el método de muestreo aleatorio estratificado y la fórmula de Cochran, el tamaño de la muestra se determinó en 216. La validez del contenido del cuestionario fue avalada por profesores, expertos y especialistas. Se extrajo el alfa de Cronbach del cuestionario para ser superior a los niveles avalados en todas las dimensiones, lo que demuestra la fiabilidad de la investigación. Los resultados muestran que los factores intraorganizacionales (organizacionales, en red, legales y fiscales) con la intervención de factores extraorganizacionales (institucionales, culturales y contextuales, de capital y ubicación) conducen al desarrollo de seis categorías de formulación de políticas de parques C&T (formulación de políticas: para la cultura y la motivación; para la creación de incentivos; para el desarrollo de capacidades y aptitudes; para la infraestructura; para atraer inversiones y para la creación de oportunidades de negocio).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Abstract 853 | PDF (English) Downloads 476

Referencias

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Sandberg, B. (2012). From new-product development to commercialization through networks. Journal of Business Research, 65(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.023

Abdullahi, A. (2004). An Impact Assessment of Science and Technology Policy on National Development of Nigeria.

Allameh, M., Zamani, M., & Davoodi, S. M. R. (2011). The relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.197

Bali, A. O., & Zarea, H. (2018). The challenges of firms in Iraqi Kurdistan economy in the light of strategic acquisition theory. In Contributions to Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71722- 7_14

Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003

Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation.2005.01.002

Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002

Caruth, D., & Handlogten, G. D. (1988). Staffing the Contemporary Organization: A Guide to Planning, Recruiting, and Selecting for Human Resource Professionals.

Conceicao, P., Conceição, P., Heitor, M. v, & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2003). Innovation, Competence Building, and Social Cohesion in Europe: Towards a Learning Society. Edward Elgar.

Cuentas, G. A., Díaz, P. A., Carballido, L. D., & Rivero, M. L. L. (2013). Science and Technology Parks’ Characterization Based on Their Business Model. 22nd International Conference on Management of Technology: IAMOT 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4173.9689

Ebrahimi, P., & Mirbargkar, S. M. (2017). Green entrepreneurship and green innovation for SME development in market turbulence. Eurasian Business Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-017-0073-9

Eriksson, E. A., & Weber, K. M. (2008). Adaptive Foresight: Navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2008.02.006

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. OUP Oxford.

Farsi, J. Y., Modarresi, M., & Zarea, H. (2011a). Obstacles and Solutions of Commercialization of University Research: Case Study of Small Businesses Development Center of University of Tehran. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 1(7).

Farsi, J. Y., Modarresi, M., & Zarea, H. (2011b). Obstacles and Solutions of Commercialization of University Research: Case Study of Small Businesses Development Center of University of Tehran. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 1(7).

Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. D. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university? www.ncge.org.uk

Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009

Guadix, J., Carrillo-Castrillo, J., Onieva, L., & Navascués, J. (2016). Success variables in science and technology parks. Journal of Business Research, 69(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.045

Gupta, R., Jain, K., Kusre, A., & Momaya, K. S. (n.d.). Technology Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in India: Findings from a Survey.

Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (2007). The handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press.

Hall, J. C., Fellow, H. B. E., Sobel, R. S., & Coffman, J. C. (2006). PUBLIC POLICY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Supporting Regional Economic Development through Analysis and Education About The Center for Applied Economics.

Hall, J., & Sobel, R. (2006). Public Policy and Entrepreneurship (Issue 060717). https://EconPapers.repec.org/ RePEc:bks:tchrpt:060717

Hart, P., & Kleiboer, M. (1995). Policy controversies in the negotiatory state. Knowledge and Policy, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832227

Hendricks, M. D. (2015). Towards an Optimal Teacher Salary Schedule: Designing Base Salary to Attract and Retain Effective Teachers. Economics of Education Review, 47, 143–167.

Hove, M., & Zinyama, T. (2012). The Challenges of Zimbabwe Science and Technology Policy Formulation from 1980 to 2002. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (Vol. 2, Issue 2).

Jack, S., Rose, M., & Johnston, L. (2009). Tracing the historical foundations of social networks in entrepreneurship research. ISBE Liverpool Annual Conference.

Jimenez-Moreno, J. J., Martínez-Cañas, R., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2013). The role of science and technology parks in the generation of firm level social capital through university–firm relations: An empirical study in Spain. In Advances in Spatial Science (Vol. 79, pp. 19–34). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7_2

Khajeheian, D., & Ebrahimi, P. (2020). Media branding and value co-creation: effect of user participation in social media of newsmedia on attitudinal and behavioural loyalty. European J. of International Management, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2020.10020735

Kostka, G. (2014). Barriers to the Implementation of Environmental Policies at the Local Level in China. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7016

Lee, H., Lee, C., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2008). On the r&d priority setting in technology foresight: A DEA and ANP approach. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0219877008001333
Machnik-Słomka, J., & Kordel, P. (2016). Significance of technological entrepreneurship and creativity in metallurgical enterprises. Metalurgija, 55(4).

Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., & Phan, P. H. (2008). Full-time faculty or part-time entrepreneurs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912813

Moreno, J. D. J. (2008). an Empirical Analysis of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Their Decisive Factors : the Case of New Spanish Firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 12.

Mu, J., & di Benedetto, C. A. (2011). Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay. R and D Management, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9310.2011.00650.x

O’shea, R., Allen, T. J., O’gorman, C., & Roche, F. W. (2004). Universities and Technology Transfer: A Review of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25, 11.

Padilla-Pérez, R., & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43, 749–759.

Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771111105631

Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2013). Technological entrepreneurship and absorptive capacity in Guangdong technology firms. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311329447

Prodan, Igor. (2007). A model of technological entrepreneurship. Handbook of Research on TechnoEntrepreneurship, 26–38. Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. In International Marketing Review (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491

Rust, F. C. (2015). Requirements for a systems-based research and development management process in transport infrastructure engineering. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1). https://doi. org/10.7166/26-1-904

Saji, K. B., & Mishra, S. S. (2013). Investigating the role of firm resources and environmental variables in new product commercialization. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22(1). https://doi. org/10.1108/10610421311298641

Schön., Rein. (1994). Frame reflection : toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic book.

Seyoum, B. (2004). The role of factor conditions in high-technology exports: An empirical examination. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.007

Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030

Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implication. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm015

Silva, S. E., Venâncio, A., Silva, J. R., & Gonçalves, C. A. (2020). Open innovation in science parks: The role of public policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2019.119844

Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2017). The public policy theory primer.

Soenarso, W. S., Nugraha, D., & Listyaningrum, E. (2013). Development of Science and Technology Park (STP) in Indonesia to Support Innovation-Based Regional Economy: Concept and Early Stage Development. World Technopolis Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2013.2.1.32

Su, Z., & Zarea, H. (2020). Policy for Fostering Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Creative Industries. Nordic Journal of Media Management, 1(4), 583–588. https://doi.org/10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.6326

Talebi, K., Salimi Torkamani, M., & Zarea, H. (2010). Identifying Key Success Factors in New Product Development of Small and Medium Enterprises: The Case of Science and Technology Parks of Tehran. JOURNAL OF NEW ECONOMY & COMMERCE, 5(19–20), 83–99. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ ViewPaper.aspx?ID=277767

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

UNCTAD. (2017). Training Course on STI Policies MODULE 1 Innovation, Policy and Development Participant’s Handbook.

Wasim, M. U. (2014). Factors for Science Park Planning. World Technopolis Review, 3(2). https://doi. org/10.7165/wtr2014.3.2.97

Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2013). Innovation financing policies for entrepreneurial development - Cases of Singapore and Taiwan as newly industrializing economies in Asia. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.09.003

Xie, K., Song, Y., Zhang, W., Hao, J., Liu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2018). Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021

Ye, J. H., Kankanhalli, A., & Yang, Z. (2012). Knowledge brokering for open innovation: A case study of innovation intermediaries. International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012, 5.

Zarea, H., Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Hejazi, S. R. (2010). Performance Evaluation of University Research Commercialization at the Universities and Institutions of Higher Education of Iran. JOURNAL OF NEW ECONOMY & COMMERCE, 6(21–22), 183–202. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper. aspx?ID=277859

Zaridis, A. D., & Mousiolis, D. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship and SME’s Organizational Structure. Elements of a Successful Business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 463–467. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.066