Leadership styles of men and women in the SMES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Leadership, gender, manager, SMEs, organizations
Abstract
Different leadership styles are exercised according to the gender (male or female). On the one hand, women have been regarded as more transformational individuals than men, who, on the contrary, are considered more transactional. In this regard, this study identifies the leadership style promoted according to the manager’s gender in the SMES of the manufacturing and high technology sector in Cali. To this end, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) is applied to a probability sample of 142 managers. The results show that the transformational style predominates in the SMES for both men and women. Therefore, there is no meaningful difference between the leadership style of both. This research contributes to a new context in which the leadership style does not vary on the basis of gender, and it raises the idea that both men and women can lead similarly.
Downloads
References
Barnet-Verzat, C., & Wolff, F.-C. (2008). Gender wage gap and the glass ceiling effect: A firm-level investigation. International Journal of Manpower, 29(6), 486-502. DOI: 10.1108/01437720810904185
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Nueva York: Free Press.
Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers. Human Resource Management, 33(4), 549-560. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.3930330405
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Bass, B., Avolio, B. J., & Atwater, L. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology, 45(1), 5-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00847.x
Brandt, T. M., & Edinger, P. (2015). Transformational leadership in teams-the effects of a team leader’s sex and personality. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(1), 44-68. DOI: 10.1108/GM-08-2013-0100
Cárdenas, M. C., Eagly, A., Salgado, E., Goode, W., Heller, L. I., Jaúregui, K., Galarza Quirós, N., Gormaz, N., Bunse, S., Godoy, M. J., Rocha Sánchez, T. E., Navarro, M., Sosa, F., Aguilera, Y., Schulmeyer, M., Tanure, B., Naranjo, M., Soto, B. E., Darre, S., & Tunqui, R. C. (2014). Latin American female business executives: An interesting surprise. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 2-24. DOI: 10.1108/GM-06-2013-0067
Centre for Social Development, Humanitarian Affairs, UNICEF, & United Nations Development Fund for Women (2015). The world’s women 2015: Trends and statistics. United Nations. Nueva York, NY: United Nations. Recuperado de https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/worldswomen.html
Davidson, M. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. Londres: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Druskat, V. U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 99-119. DOI: 10.1016/1048-9843(94)90023-X
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-rol interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807-834. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781-797. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly, A., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. En T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ember, C. E., Ember, M., y Peregrine, P. N. (2004). Antropología. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Franklin, E., y Krieger, M. J. (2012). Comportamiento organizacional. Enfoque para América Latina. México: Pearson.
Freeman, S. (1990). Managing lives: Corporate women and social change. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Gartzia, L., & Van Engen, M. (2012). Are (male) leaders “feminine” enough? Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27(5), 296-314. DOI: 10.1108/17542411211252624
Hellriegel, D., y Slocum, J. (2009). Comportamiento organizacional, 12ª ed. México: Cengage Learning.
Hernandez Bark, A. S., Escartín, J., & Van Dick, R. (2014). Gender and leadership in Spain: A systematic review of some key aspects. Sex Roles, 70(11-12), 522-537. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-014-0375-7
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación, 5ª ed. México: Mc Graw Hill.
Jayme, M., y Sau, V. (2004). Psicología diferencial del sexo y el género: fundamentos. Barcelona: Icaria.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616-642. DOI: 10.1037/a0023557
Komives, S. (1991). Gender differences in the relationship of hall directors’ transformational and transactional leadership and achieving styles. Journal of College Student Development, 32(2), 155-165. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025647811219
Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593-641. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.593
Kotttak, C. P. (2011). Antropología cultural, 14ª ed. México: McGraw-Hill.
Lamas, M. (1994). Cuerpo: diferencia sexual y género. Debate feminista, 10, 3-31. Recuperado de https://ideasfem.wordpress.com/textos/k/k05/
Lindsey, L. (2015). Gender roles: A sociological perspective, 6ª ed. Nueva York, NY: Pearson.
López Zafra, E., y Morales, J. F. (1998). La función directiva en los centros docentes. Liderazgo transformacional y género. Boletín de Psicología, 60, 15-26.
Lopez-Zafra, E., García-Retamero, R., & Berrios Martos, M. P. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and emotional intelligence from a gendered approach. The Psychological Record, 62, 97-114. DOI: 10.1007/BF03395790
Martin, J. (2015). Transformational and transactional leadership: An exploration of gender, experience, and institution type. Libraries and the Academy, 15(2), 331-351. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2015.0015
Miranda-Novoa, M. (2012). Diferencia entre la perspectiva de género y la ideología de género. Dikaion, 21(2), 337-356.
Newstrom, J. (2011). Comportamiento humano en el trabajo,13ª ed. México: McGraw-Hill.
Nicholson, L. (1997). The myth of the traditional family. En H. Lindemann Nelson (Ed.), Feminism and families (pp. 27-42). Londres: Psychology Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pai, K., & Vaidya, S. (2009). Glass ceiling: Role of women in the corporate world. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 19(2), 106-113. DOI: 10.1108/10595420910942270
Pooja, A., & Kumar, P. (2016). The effect of gender on leadership and its sub variables in the Indian service sector. Purusharta: A Journal of Management Ethics and Spirituality, 7(2), 30-35.
Powell, G. N., & Eddleston, K. (2011). Work family enrichment and entrepreneurial success: Do female entrepreneurs benefit most? Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-16. DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2011.65869189
Ritter, B. a., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 187-193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00135.x
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2013). Comportamiento organizacional, 5ª ed. México: Pearson.
Rosener, J. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-126.
Sánchez Manchola, I. D. (2009). Estilos de dirección y liderazgo en la organizaciones: Propuesta de un modelo para su caracterización y análisis. Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.
Schein, E. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Segerman-Peck, L. M. (1991). Networking and mentoring: A woman’s guide. Londres: Piatkus Books.
Trombetta, C., Liguori, G., & Bertolotto, M. (Eds.). (2015). Management of gender dysphoria: A multidisciplinary approach. Nueva York, NY: Springer.
Turner, C. (1993). Women’s business in Europe: EEC initiatives. En A. Sheila & C. Truman (Eds.), Women in business: Perspectives on women entrepreneurs (pp. 133-147.). Londres: Routledge Press.
Van Engen, M. L., Van der Leeden, R., & Willemsen, T. M. (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 581-598. DOI: 10.1348/096317901167532
Vecchio, R. P. (2003). In search of gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 835-850. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.005
Vinkenburg, C. J., Van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Mónica García Solarte, Universidad del Valle
Profesora Titular
Departamento de Adminsitración y Organizaciones
Facultad de Ciencias de la Adminsitración
Grupo de Investigación Humanismo y Gestión
Laura Salas-Arbelaez, Universidad del Valle
Profesional de Investigación
Grupo de Investigación Humanismo y Gestión
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).