Expressions in logical and argumental knowledge

Main Article Content

Julder Gómez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-555X

Keywords

Husserl, phenomenology, Perelman, argument, expressions

Abstract

In this paper I echo and discuss the husserlian thesis according to which , from t h e philosophical viewpoint, study of knowledge could be confused with the study either of necessary previous conditions or of its consequences (See, for example, Husserl 1998, pp. 95-103, 155-243). The paper shows the site or place that the study of linguistic expressions enjoys with respect to this difficulty in the logical investigations and goes to the discuss some phenomenological distinctions relative to linguistic expressions, observing that the initial understanding seems to restrict itself to just logical knowledge. With the purpose of making the last point clear, we end up considering language and argumentative knowledge in the light of the previously given phenomenological distinctions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 705 | PDF (Español) Downloads 2043

References

Apel, Carl (1985) La Transformación de la Filosofía (I). Madrid, Taurus.

Heidegger, Martin (2004) Lógica. Madrid, Alianza.

Husserl, Edmund (1995) Investigaciones Lógicas (I y II). Barcelona, Altaza.

Perelman, Ch. y Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1989) Tratado de la Argumentación. Madrid,Gredos.

Tugendhat, E. y Wolf, U. (1997) Propedéutica Lógico-semántica. Barcelona, Anthropos.

Welton, Donn (1983) Theorigins of meaning. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff